Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
Instruction to students: You are required to attach both the Turnitin report and AI Turnitin report that show the percentage of plagiarism. You may upload these two reports independently or attach them to the end page of the assignment. No extension is allowed without valid reasons, e.g. hospitalisation.
You are hired as a junior management consultant by a mid-sized retail company in Malaysia that operates three departments: Clothing, Electronics, and Groceries. The company is experiencing cost overruns and inconsistent departmental performance.
Management has requested both qualitative analysis and basic quantitative insights to support planning and control decisions.
Your task is to prepare a report in MS Word or pdf (maximum 1,000 words) that includes the following:
Using the data below, perform basic calculations and interpret the results.
Department | Sales (RM) | Variable Costs (RM) | Fixed Costs (Allocated) (RM) |
Clothing | 50,000 | 30,000 | 10,000 |
Electronics | 40,000 | 28,000 | 10,000 |
Groceries | 60,000 | 45,000 | 10,000 |
Note:
You are required to:
🔸Compare the contribution margin and net profit across all departments.
🔸Identify which department is more profitable or efficient and justify your reasoning.
🔸Recommend actions to improve financial performance, such as:
🔸Budget planning
🔸Departmental accountability
🔸Operational control
Discuss limitations and real-world issues of using such simplified accounting data:
🔸Challenges in allocating fixed costs
🔸Behavior impact on department heads
🔸Uncontrollable vs. controllable costs
Requirement
Your report must contain the following components:
Executive Summary (Approx. 150 words)
Summarize key findings:
🔸Contribution margin and net profit by department
🔸Recommendation: e.g., improve control in Groceries, focus investment in Clothing
🔸Highlight usefulness of internal cost reports for planning/control
Section A: Cost Classification and Relevance (Approx. 300 words)
Section B: Basic Cost Analysis and Interpretation (Approx. 500–600 words)
Section C: Internal Reporting & Control (Approx. 300–400 words)
Section D: Limitations and Practical Insights (Approx. 300 words)
Conclusion (Approx. 150 words)
References
🔸Use at least 3–5 credible sources (e.g., textbooks in the last years only, academic articles in the last 5 years only, CIMA resources)
Penalty for late submission:
Rubric 20 marks | ||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeUnderstanding of the Activity | 5 PtsEcellentDemonstrates strong understanding; clearly applies and integrates key management accounting concepts.
4 PtsAdequateAdequate understanding; concepts are mostly integrated and applied logically. 3 PtsSatisfactoryBasic understanding; some concepts applied but lacks integration. 2 PtsNeed improvementConcepts misapplied or absent; weak grasp of activity context. 0 PtsNo markNo work is presented. |
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAnalysis and Interpretation of Results | 5 PtsExcellentAccurate calculations; insightful analysis of results (e.g., CM, ratios); clear business implications.
4 PtsAdequateMostly accurate calculations and fair interpretation; some useful insights provided. 3 PtsSatisfactoryBasic calculations; interpretation is general and lacks connection to decisions. 2 PtsNeed improvementIncorrect or missing calculations; interpretation is weak or irrelevant. 0 PtsNo markNo work is presented. |
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeApplication to Planning & Control | 5 PtsExcellentStrong linkage between data analysis and planning/control decisions; practical and relevant suggestions.
4 PtsAdeqauteReasonable connection between analysis and decision-making; ideas are mostly practical. 3 PtsSatisfactorySome attempt to connect data to planning/control; ideas need more clarity. 2 PtsNeed improvementPoor or unclear link between accounting information and decision-making. 0 PtsNo MarkNo work is presented |
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeStructure, Language & References | 5 PtsExceedsWell-structured, clear language, professional tone; uses 3+ relevant sources to support justification.
4 PtsMasteryGenerally well-written; some referencing from relevant sources (2–3 used). 3 PtsNearAcceptable writing; structure may be inconsistent; limited reference use (1–2). 2 PtsBelowDisorganized, unclear or casual writing; no or inappropriate referencing. 0 PtsNo markNo work is presented. |
5 pts |
Total points: 20
Oral presentation
Instructions to students: You are required to record this video (5 to 7 minutes) with the camera on. You need to submit the following documents:
1. Recording (Media file). DO NOT submit this file using link. Instead, pls upload this file here.
2. Powerpoint slides (Canva or MS ppt slides)You are acting as a junior management consultant for a mid-sized Malaysian retail company with three departments: Clothing, Electronics, and Groceries. The company has requested a short executive briefing on your findings to guide their internal planning and cost control efforts
Rubric (oral presentation) 10 marks
Rubric (oral presentation) 10 marks | ||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeUnderstanding of Cost Concepts | 2 PtsExcellentClearly explains relevant concepts (e.g., fixed/variable costs, CM) and applies them accurately.
1 PtsAdeqquateShows some understanding but may be unclear or partial in application. 0 PtsNeeds ImprovementLimited or incorrect explanation of key cost concepts. |
2 pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAccuracy of Calculations & Analysis | 2 PtsExcellentAll figures are accurate; contribution margin and interpretation are correct and well explained.
1 PtsAdequateMinor errors or basic interpretation without much depth. 0 PtsNeed improvementSerious errors or missing analysis; no clear interpretation of results. |
2 pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeRecommendations & Decision Use | 2 PtsExcellentPractical and well-justified recommendations linked clearly to the analysis.
1 PtsAdequateSome relevant ideas, but not clearly linked to data or planning decisions. 0 PtsNeed improvementWeak or vague recommendations with little justification. |
2 pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation Delivery | 2 PtsExcellentClear, confident, good pacing, and appropriate tone; engages audience well.
1 PtsAdeqauteSome hesitation or lack of fluency, but generally understandable. 0 PtsNeed improvementDifficult to follow, mumbled, or unclear presentation. |
2 pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeUse of Visual Aids & Time Management | 2 PtsExcellentUses tables/graphs effectively and stays within the time limit (5–7 min).
1 PtsAdeqauteVisuals used but not effectively; slightly under/over time. 0 PtsNeed improvementNo visuals or poorly timed presentation. |
2 pts |
Total points: 10
Hire case study helper from Malaysia Assignment Help to complete Cost Control & Profitability Analysis Assignment or submit your assignment before the deadline. Here you will get 100% original content. You can also check the quality of your assignment by looking at the assignment samples. Contact us now!