Convincing Features
Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
Tarikh Penghantaran : 3 November 2025.
Part 1
The purpose of this assignment is to enhance learners’ ability to discuss the significant role played by the government in shaping and regulating industrial relations system in Malaysia.
Select an organisation you are familiar with. Discuss the role of the government in shaping Industrial Relations (IR) system within the selected organisation, and evaluate the effectiveness of Malaysian IR institutions. Finally, recommend how the government can further promote a balanced and fair IR environment.
| *QN/ *NS | CLO | Criteria/
Kriteria |
Weight/ Pemberat | Excellent/
Cemerlang |
Good/
Baik |
Fair/
Sederhana |
Poor/
Lemah |
Unsatisfactory/ Tidak memuaskan | Max Marks |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| 1 | 2 | Introduction of the selected organisation.
|
1 | Clear introduction of all of the following:
· Name of the organisation · Products and services · Type of industry · Number of employees
|
Clear introduction of three (3) of the following:
· Name of the organisation · Products and services · Type of industry · Number of employees
|
Clear introduction of two (2) of the following:
· Name of the organisation · Products and services · Type of industry · Number of employees
|
Clear introduction of one (1) of the following:
· Name of the organisation · Products and services · Type of industry · Number of employees
|
No introduction | 4 |
| Pengenalan tentang organisasi yang dipilih.
|
Pengenalan yang jelas tentang semua yang berikut:
· Nama organisasi · Produk dan perkhidmatan · Jenis industri · Bilangan pekerja
|
Pengenalan yang jelas tentang tiga (3) yang berikut:
· Nama organisasi · Produk dan perkhidmatan · Jenis industri · Bilangan pekerja
|
Pengenalan yang jelas tentang dua (2) yang berikut:
· Nama organisasi · Produk dan perkhidmatan · Jenis industri · Bilangan pekerja
|
Pengenalan yang jelas tentang satu (1) yang berikut:
· Nama organisasi · Produk dan perkhidmatan · Jenis industri · Bilangan pekerja
|
Tiada pengenalan. | ||||
| 2 | Discussion on the roles of the government in shaping the Industrial Relations (IR) system in the selected organisation.
|
3 | The discussion was very clear and detailed.
|
The discussion was clear and quite detailed.
|
The discussion was brief and quite clear.
|
The discussion was brief and vague. | No discussion. | 12 | |
| Perbincangan mengenai peranan-peranan kerajaan dalam membentuk sistem Perhubungan Perusahaan (IR) di organisasi yang dipilih. | Perbincangan adalah sangat jelas dan terperinci. | Perbincangan adalah jelas dan agak terperinci. | Perbincangan adalah ringkas dan agak jelas.
|
Perbincangan adalah ringkas dan kabur. | Tiada perbincangan. | ||||
| 2 | Evaluation on the effectiveness of Malaysian IR institutions.
|
3.5 | The evaluation was very clear and detailed and supported with relevant examples.
|
The evaluation was clear and quite detailed and supported with relevant examples.
|
The evaluation was brief but quite clear and supported with relevant examples. | The evaluation was brief and vague and not supported with relevant example. | No evaluation. | 14 | |
| Penilaian mengenai keberkesanan institusi-institusi IR di Malaysia.
|
Penilaian adalah sangat jelas dan terperinci dan disokong dengan contoh-contoh yang relevan. | Penilaian adalah jelas dan agak terperinci dan disokong dengan contoh-contoh yang relevan.
|
Penilaian adalah ringkas dan agak jelas dan disokong dengan contoh-contoh yang relevan.
|
Penilaian adalah ringkas dan kabur dan tidak disokong dengan contoh yang relevan.
|
Tiada penilaian. | ||||
| 3 | Recommendations on how the government can further promote a balanced and fair IR environment.
|
4 | Four (4) feasible recommendations were given and supported with clear justification. | Three (3) feasible recommendations were given and supported with clear justification. | Two (2) feasible recommendations were given and supported with clear justification. | Only one (1) feasible recommendation was given and supported with clear justification. | No recommendation. | 16 | |
| Cadangan mengenai bagaimana kerajaan boleh terus mempromosikan persekitaran IR yang seimbang dan adil.
|
Empat (4) cadangan boleh laksana telah diberikan dan disokong dengan justifikasi yang jelas.
|
Tiga (3) cadangan boleh laksana telah diberikan dan disokong dengan justifikasi yang jelas. | Dua (2) cadangan boleh laksana telah diberikan dan disokong dengan justifikasi yang jelas. | Hanya satu (1) cadangan boleh laksana telah diberikan dan disokong dengan justifikasi yang jelas. | Tiada cadangan. | ||||
| 3 | Summary.
|
1 | The summary covered all of the key points of the assignment.
|
The summary covered most of the key points of the assignment. | The summary covered some of the key points of the assignment.
|
The summary did not cover the key points of the assignment. | No summary. | 4 | |
| Ringkasan.
|
Ringkasan meliputi semua isi-isi penting tugasan. | Ringkasan meliputi kebanyakan isi-isi penting tugasan.
|
Ringkasan meliputi beberapa isi-isi penting tugasan. | Ringkasan tidak meliputi isi-isi penting tugasan. | Tiada ringkasan. | ||||
| Total | 12.5 | 50 | |||||||
*QN = Question Number / *NS = Nombor Soalan
| *QN | CLO | Criteria | Weight | Excellent/
Cemerlang |
Good/
Baik |
Fair/
Sederhana |
Poor/
Lemah |
Unsatisfactory/ Tidak memuaskan | Max Marks |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| 1& 2 | 3 | Quality of Postings
Affective Domain (A3) |
2.5 | All five comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful, and respectful.
Postings reflect active participation within assignment timeline.
|
Four of the comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful, and respectful.
Postings reflect participation within assignment timeline.
|
Two or three of the comments are somewhat good, appropriate, meaningful and respectful.
Postings show relatively short participation time
|
One post submitted. OR All posts done in one day.
OR None of the comments are good and relevant. OR Comments are short responses that are not substantial nor meaningful. Minimum effort (e.g. “I agree with Tina”) |
Postings done past assignment timeline.
OR No postings given as proof of participation in discussion
|
10 |
| Kualiti Postings
Domain Afektif (A3) |
Kelima-lima komen baik, sesuai, relevan, bermakna dan berhemah.
Postings mencerminkan penyertaan aktif sepanjang tempoh tugasan.
|
Empat komen baik, sesuai, relevan, bermakna dan berhemah.
Postings mencerminkan penyertaan sepanjang tempoh tugasan. |
Dua atau tiga komen baik, sesuai, relevan,bermakna dan berhemah
Postings menunjukkan penyertaan dalam jangakamasa yang singkat. |
Satu penghantaran
ATAU Semua penghantaran dibuat dalam satu hari . ATAU Tiada komen yang baik dan relevan. ATAU Komen hanya respon yang ringkas dan tidak meluas dan tidak bermakna.Usaha minimum (Cth: “Saya bersetuju dengan Tina”)
|
Postings melepasi tempoh tugasan.
ATAU Tiada Postings diberi sebagai bukti penyertaan dalam perbincangan |
||||
| Total | 2.5 | 10 | |||||||
*QN = Question Number / *NS = Nombor Soalan
INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO SUBMIT PROOF OF ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION (10%)
Do the following:
ARAHAN BAGI TATACARA PENGHANTARAN SEBAGAI BUKTI AKTIVITI ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION (10%)
Laksanakan perkara berikut:
Many students struggle with Industrial Relations assignments because they involve analysing government roles, labour laws, and workplace policies. If topics like collective bargaining or fair employment feel overwhelming, don’t worry — expert guidance can make things easier. At Malaysia Assignment Help , we offer BBHI4103 Industrial Relations assignment help that’s 100% human-written, plagiarism-free, and aligned with Malaysian university standards. Get reliable support for your studies with our assignment writing help Malaysia today.
