Convincing Features
Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
Please Carefully Read And Adhere To The Following Course Requirements
Your attendance in MS-TEAMS (the only one that counts and matters!) and participation in class discussions are vital to your success in this course. The in-class activities will provide ample opportunity for you to share your ideas, thoughts, and experiences with the rest of the class. However, if you are unable to attend my class, please inform me (via email) ahead of time and provide a letter from the university if you are participating in any official events; or if you are unwell, a valid medical certificate from the doctor.
Assignments are due on the dates specified in my Teaching Schedule. Please be informed that NO LATE SUBMISSION will be accepted, regardless of reason. Therefore, prioritize and plan your work well!
| 1) | Assignment 1 o Presentation: 10% o Report: 20% |
30% |
| 2) | Mid-semester test | 20% |
| 3) | Assignment 2 o Presentation: 15% o Report: 25% |
40% |
| 4) | Review Writing (individual) | 10% |
| Total | 100% |
The written report not more than 5,000 words, excluding references. (4,500 – 5,000 words)
| Group 1: Technological Capabilities and Firm-Level Innovation
Discuss how firms develop technological capabilities to enhance innovation and competitiveness. Key areas to address: • Definition and components of technological capabilities • Role of R&D, knowledge accumulation, and learning processes • Impact of technological capabilities on innovation performance • Case studies of firms with strong technological capabilities • Strategic implications for firm competitiveness
|
| Group 2: Technological Capabilities and Industry Transformation
Analyze how technological capabilities drive structural transformation within industries. Key areas: • Role of technology in industry evolution • Impact of automation, digitalization, and advanced manufacturing • Industry transformation in Malaysia (e.g., manufacturing, energy, digital economy) • Strategic opportunities and risks associated with technological change • Policy and business implications
|
| Group 3: Technological Capabilities and Digital Transformation
Examine how organizations leverage technological capabilities to implement digital transformation strategies. Key areas: • Digital technologies (AI, big data, cloud computing, IoT) • Strategic role of digital transformation in business competitiveness • Challenges faced by firms in adopting digital technologies • Malaysian company case studies • Strategic recommendations for strengthening digital capabilities
|
| Group 4: Role of Human Capital in Building Technological Capabilities
Analyze the role of skills, knowledge, and talent development in building technological capabilities. Key areas: • Relationship between human capital and technological capability development • Role of education, training, and organizational learning • Talent gaps in technology-intensive industries • Strategies for developing technological talent in Malaysia • Strategic implications for firms and policymakers
|
| Group 5: Technological Capabilities and Global Value Chain Participation
Examine how technological capabilities influence a country’s position in global value chains (GVCs). Key areas: • Concept of technological upgrading • Role of technology in moving up the value chain • Malaysia’s participation in global manufacturing and technology sectors • Opportunities and challenges for upgrading technological capabilities • Strategic policy recommendations
|
| Group 6: Technological Capabilities and SME Competitiveness
Analyze how SMEs develop technological capabilities to remain competitive. Key areas: • Importance of technology adoption among SMEs • Barriers faced by SMEs in developing technological capabilities • Role of government support programs and digitalization initiatives • Case studies of innovative Malaysian SMEs • Strategic recommendations for strengthening SME technological capacity Evaluation criteria: Please see the rubric for presentation. |
Total Marks: 40%
Assignment Objectives
This assignment aims to enable students to:
Assignment Guidelines
Provide an overview of the semiconductor industry in Malaysia, including:
The objectives and purpose of conducting a strategic case study on a Malaysian semiconductor company.
Each group will select one well-known semiconductor company operating in Malaysia and develop a strategic case study based on primary insights gathered through interviews.
Examples of companies may include:
Students are encouraged to conduct 3–4 interviews with representatives from different departments within the selected company.
Based on interviews with company representatives, analyze the following areas:
Strategic Vision and Leadership
Departmental Roles and Contributions
Examine how different departments contribute to the company’s strategic objectives, such as:
Challenges and Strategic Responses
Identify major challenges faced by the company, such as:
Explain how the company strategically responds to these challenges.
Students must apply at least two strategic management frameworks, such as:
The frameworks should be used to provide structured strategic insights into the company’s competitive position.
Based on the analysis and interview findings, groups should provide:
Recommendations should be practical, realistic, and supported by analysis.
Summarize the main findings of the strategic analysis, highlighting the company’s:
Assessment Criteria
Each group will consist of the same member of group as assignment 1 and 2.
The topic for the review writing will be given in the class.
The review report not more than 3,000 words, excluding references. The references should follow APA format.
General Instructions for all Group:
The group must prepare a written report for assignments 1, 2, and review writing (1.5 spaced; font size 12) for the given task. The presenting group may use PowerPoint and any other presentation materials to facilitate the presentation and understanding of the topic. The presentation slides also have to be submitted based on the stated date line. The Turnitin similarity must be less than 15%. For evaluation criteria, please see the rubric for presentation and the rubric for content assessment (written report).
| Criteria Scale | Very Poor (1) | Poor (2) | Fair
(3) |
Good (4) | Very Good (5) | Total |
| Content (40%)
includes adequate coverage of knowledge in the issues presented |
No essential information and details |
Lack of essential information and details |
Includes most essential information, details are somewhat sketchy |
Includes essential information with some supporting details |
Covers topic thoroughly, includes details that support the topic |
x8 = |
| Presentation (20%) includes English proficiency, eloquence and clarity |
Not clear, not understandable |
Lack of clarity and understandable |
Clear and
understandable, uses limited delivery techniques |
Engage audience, fluid delivery, uses different approach other than simply reading screen, invites questions |
Well prepared, speaks clearly, delivers with ease, invites questions |
x4 = |
| Slides/Video (20%) refers to the attractiveness of visual presentation used |
Text is very difficult to read, layout is cluttered and confusing |
Text is difficult to read, layout is less appealing and confusing |
Text is sometimes hard to read, sometimes graphics or special effects distract from understanding | Visually attractive, text is easy to read, colors enhance readability, graphics and special effects do not distract from understanding ideas | Visually appealing, clean simple layout, text is easy to read, graphics enhance understanding ideas |
x4 = |
| Attitude (10%)
includes dress, posture , eye contact, time used and mannerism during presentation |
Poor eye contact, volume too low or loud, over time |
Inconsistent with eye contact and volume. Obvious distracting mannerism(s); Over time | Good eye contact, no distracting gestures, usually has appropriate volume; on-time |
Excellent eye contact, no distracting gestures, appropriate volume; on- time |
Presenter has a clear presence in the room that commands attention; ontime |
x2 = |
|
Q & A (10%) |
Answers ramble, offtarget; may have poor eye contact when answering | Answers are inconsistent in quality, either in substance or delivery | Answers are uniformly good, both in substance and delivery | Answers are uniformly good, and show knowledge beyond presentation | Shows knowledge at a professional level for the topic. Answers questions with authority |
x2 = |
| Grand Total | % | |||||
| DIMENSIONS | TRAITS | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|
ORGANISATION |
Introduction | Not clearly stated about the topic | Presents the topic but does not engage the reader | Clearly presents the topic in informative manner |
| Conclusion | Lacks an identifiable conclusion | Summarize and repeat what has been said | Summarize and offer excellent overview of the topic | |
| Logical Flow | No logical flow, confusing, choppy | Sensible flow but inconsistent | Logical and consistent flow | |
| Layout | Poor labeling of sections, sub- topics, tables and figures | Improper and inconsistent labeling | Sections, sub- topics, tables and figures are clearly labeled | |
| Sentencing | Poor sentence connection, long sentences | Acceptable sentencing but not clear enough | Excellent connection with clear sentences | |
|
IDEAS (CONTENT) |
Problem statement | No identification of statement | Too broad or too narrow and loosely presented | Clear and focused statement |
| Evidence of support | Missing or irrelevant supporting ideas | Relevant support of ideas | Well supported with relevant details | |
| Provision of examples | No example given | Adequate examples with no connection to the ideas | Relevant examples which connect to the ideas | |
| Presentation of argument | Repetitive or lack of clear point | Satisfactory argument | Excellent and original
argument |
|
| REFERENCE | No reference | Available but inadequate, no proper referencing | Comprehensive compilation of reference |
Many students find CQD7013 strategic management and planning assignments difficult because they involve strategic analysis, industry research, case study evaluation, presentation preparation, and APA referencing together in one coursework. Understanding strategic frameworks like SWOT, PESTEL, Porter’s Five Forces, and applying them to Malaysian semiconductor companies can also take a lot of time and research. If you are struggling with your assignment, you can get support from Malaysia Assignment Help through our report assignment help service. Our experts provide plagiarism-free and human-written assignment solutions based on university guidelines and real case study analysis. You can also explore our CQD7013 assignment answer to check the quality of work we provide for business and management students.
