Convincing Features
Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
Lecturer: Dr Annie Wang Pei Ling
| Session | : January 2026 | |
| Type | : Group Assignment | |
| Weighting | : 50% | |
| Submission | : Week 6 (1 March 2026) |
Number of members : 5 – 6 students Word count : 3,000 – 3,500 words
“Leading Through Turbulence: A Strategic Organisational Behaviour (OB) Audit and Intervention”
Your group is acting as a specialised OB Consulting Firm. You are required to select a real-world organisation that has undergone a significant change or crisis in the last 24 months (e.g., a merger, a leadership scandal, a digital transformation, or a major workforce restructuring).
Your team must conduct a Comprehensive OB Audit and propose a strategic intervention plan focusing on three levels of analysis: Individual, Group, and Organisational System.
To ensure all 6 members contribute equally, the report should be divided into the following sections:
(a) Organisational Context and Diagnostics: Analyse the current climate and the specific “trigger” event using a diagnostic framework (e.g., Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model).
(b) Individual Level: Motivation and Perception: Analyse how the event affected employee morale, using theories like Expectancy Theory or the Job Characteristics Model or any other theories.
(c) Group Level: Team Dynamics and Conflict: Evaluate how the crisis impacted team cohesion and psychological safety. Apply Tuckman’s Model or Lencioni’s Five Dysfunctions or any other models.
(d) Leadership and Power: Critique the leadership style displayed during the event. Was it Transformational, Transactional, or Level 5 Leadership? How was power exercised?
(e) Organisational Culture: Map the culture using the Competing Values Framework. Determine if the culture helped or hindered the organisation’s response.
(f) Strategic Intervention and Change Management: Propose a 12-month roadmap for improvement using Kotter’s 8-Step Process or Lewin’s Three-Step Model.
Your report should be formatted as a professional academic submission, following a logical and sequential order.
The first page of your report will be the cover page (as provided). Following the cover page, include the grading criteria provided for the assignment.
The table of contents is essential for navigation. It should list all sections, subsections, and their corresponding page numbers. This provides a clear overview of your report’s structure and helps the reader quickly find specific information.
This is the core of your report. Organise it into numbered sections with clear, descriptive headings.
A Reference List is a crucial component of academic writing. You must use the APA Referencing style to cite all sources you used in your report. This includes books, journal articles, websites, and other materials. Ensure your citations in the text and your reference list are consistent and accurate to avoid plagiarism.
The Turnitin report must be added as the very last page of your submission. This report verifies the originality of your work by checking for similarities with other sources.
Be mindful of the late submission policy. A deduction of 5% per day will be applied for reports submitted after the deadline. To avoid this, plan your time carefully to ensure you complete your report on time.
(Students, this portion is for administrative purposes, you can ignore it)
Learning outcome No. 2 (50%) – Practice effective social skills and teamwork in achieving the business operational efficiency (A5, PLO4).
| REPORT | Presentation & structure | Use & presentation of APA Referencing | Content/ Terms/ Findings/ Definitions/ Calculations | Business Application & Integration of Data/Literature |
Discussion /Analysis /Critical evaluation &/or Reflection |
| Task details | Follows report structure | Follows APA style for intext citation & Reference List |
Content included- specify requirements as in module guide & coursework guidance | Integration & application of information from coursework guidance/module guide |
Line of argument, development of discussion |
| Marks | /15 Marks | /15 Marks | /20 Marks | /20 Marks | /30 Marks |
| 80-100 Outstanding | Outstanding… Presentation & report structure, with numbered paragraphs, list of contents/figures & appendices. Articulate & fluent academic writing style with ideas cross referenced. No grammatical / spelling errors. |
Outstanding… Standard of referencing within text & consistent use of APA referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. |
Outstanding… Exploration of topic showing excellent knowledge & understanding through thorough & appropriate research. Impressive choice and range of appropriate content. |
Outstanding… Business insight & application. Breadth, depth & integration of literature/data into work. |
Outstanding… Level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. Highly developed/ focused work. |
| 70-79 Excellent | Excellent… Presentation & report structure, with numbered paragraphs, list of contents/figures, appendices & cross referencing. Articulate & fluent academic writing style. Only a minor error. |
Excellent… Standard of referencing within text & consistent use of APA referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. |
Excellent… Level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated. Evidence of appropriate reading. Covers all relevant points & issues. |
Excellent… Business insight & application. Breadth, depth & integration of literature/data into work. |
Excellent… Level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection clearly developing points in the appropriate way with thorough consideration of all possibilities. |
| 60-69 Very Good | Very good… Presentation & report structure, paragraphing, use of numbering, list of contents/figures, appendices & cross referencing. Fluent academic writing style. Very few grammatical errors & spelling mistakes. |
Very good… Standard of referencing within text & consistent use of APA referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. |
Very good… Level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated. Covers most relevant points & issues. Few errors / omissions in content/calculations. |
Very good… Business insight & application. Breadth, depth & integration of literature/data into work. |
Very good… Level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection & a few ideas/points could benefit from further development &/or evaluation/comparison. |
| 55-59 Good | Good… Clear presentation & report structure, use of numbering & appendices. Writing is mainly clear but some spelling &/ or grammatical errors. |
Good… Standard of referencing within text & consistent use of APA referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. |
Good… Grasp of the topic & some of its implications presented. Knowledge & understanding is demonstrated. Minor errors / omissions in content/ calculations. |
Good… Business insight & application. Breadth, depth & integration of literature/data into work. |
Good… Level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but more ideas/points could be addressed /developed further. |
| 50-54 Satisfactory | Satisfactory… Basic report structure. Not always written clearly & has grammatical & / or spelling errors. |
Satisfactory… Basic referencing within text & consistent use of APA referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. |
Satisfactory… Content / level of knowledge of the topic. Addresses part of the task. Some errors / omissions in content/ calculations. May benefit from further research. |
Satisfactory… Business insight & application. Limited integration with literature/ data. Use of literature/data but limited in breadth OR depth. |
Satisfactory… Basic evidence of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but some points superficially made so need further development. |
| 40-49 Marginal Fail | Weak… Report format, limited or poor structure. Muddled work with many spelling & / or grammatical errors. |
Weak… Use of APA referencing system with errors & inconsistently applied. Limited referencing within the text. Limited accuracy of in-text references compared to those in the final Reference list. |
Weak… Limited content / knowledge/ calculations. Limited or muddled understanding of the topic/question. Does not meet all the learning outcomes. |
Weak… Unsatisfactory evidence of business application & insight. Work needs to show better links between practical application and theory. |
Weak… Limited evidence of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. More development & comment needed. May need to do more than describe. |
| 20 – 39 Clear Fail | Inadequate… Report format and poor paragraphing / signposting. Inappropriate writing style. Poorly written &/or poor spelling & grammar. |
Inadequate… Use of APA referencing with many errors &/or inconsistencies. | Inadequate… Lacking in relevant content/ knowledge/calculations. Content irrelevant / inaccurate. Does not meet all the learning outcomes. |
Inadequate… Lacks evidence of business application & insight. Some literature irrelevant to topic. |
Inadequate… Lacking / inadequate level of discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation &/or reflection. Descriptive. |
| 1 – 19 Little or Nothing of merit | Nothing of merit… Poorly written work, lacking structure, paragraphing / signposting. Many inaccuracies in spelling & grammar. |
Nothing of merit… No or little attempt to use the recommended APA referencing system. | Nothing of merit… Unsatisfactory level of knowledge demonstrated. Content used irrelevant / not appropriate/ to the topic. Does not meet the learning outcomes. |
Nothing of merit… No evidence of appropriate business application & insight. | Nothing of merit… Unsatisfactory level of discussion/analysis/critical evaluation &/or reflection. |
Many IIU students find the MGT7204E Organisational Behaviour Group Assignment challenging due to its consultancy-style OB audit, advanced theories, and group coordination requirements. Students often struggle to apply multi-level OB frameworks, analyse real organisational crises, or develop a strong intervention roadmap within word limits. There’s no need to worry—Malaysia Assignment Help provides expert Organisational Behaviour Assignment Help aligned fully with IIU academic and APA standards.
For trust and confidence, you can review group assignment samples written by our management and OB subject experts. Order today with malaysia assignment writing help and receive a fully customised, plagiarism-free, human-written MGT7204E group assignment prepared only for your team.
