HRM501 Human Resource Management Assessment Brief 2026 | LUC
Assignment Type
Individual Assignment
Subject
HRM501 Human Resource Management
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
02/26/2026
HRM501 Module Outline
1. INTRODUCTION
This course is designed to provide student an understanding of contemporary HRM and the various functions of human resource management, including compensation and benefits, staffing, recruitment and selection, research, labour relations, training and development, health and safety, planning, mediation and arbitration, the influence of government legislation on industry, and human rights legislation and employment equity.
2. COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME
On successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
| CLO1 | Outline the importance of human resource management in the context of overall management process. (C4, PLO1) |
| CLO2 | Analyze the human resource management strategies in planning and recruiting. (C4, PLO2) |
| CLO3 | Compare the global differences and similarities in human resource practices . (C4, PLO5) |
| CLO4 | Evaluate issues related to human resource management to enhance the development of entrepreneurial skills. (C5, PLO10) |
MODULE CONTENT
| Module Title | Human Resource Management | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Module Code | HRM501 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Module Tutor | Mrs. Nor Syafiqah Binti Abdullah | ||||||||||||||||||||
| School | School Of Business And Management | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit hours | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Level of Study | MQFL7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Brief Description | This course introduces students to the fundamentals of contemporary Human Resource Management (HRM). It covers key functions such as recruitment and selection, compensation and benefits, labour relations, training and development, health and safety, planning, and mediation. The course also highlights the impact of government legislation on industry, as well as human rights and employment equity. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Indicative Syllabus |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Learning and Teaching Activities | Lecturer / Tutorial | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assessment details |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Main References | Main references supporting the course
Additional References supporting the course:
|
Get Expert Help with HRM501 Assignment at Lincoln University College
HRM501 ASSESSMENT BRIEFS
Assessment 001
Case Study: Bonus System Demotivation at Orion Electronics Sdn. Bhd.
Background of the Company
Orion Electronics Sdn. Bhd., headquartered in Penang, Malaysia, is a mid-sized consumer-electronics manufacturer employing about 750 employees.
The company has a Sales & Marketing Division of 60 people who sell Orion’s smart-home appliances across Malaysia and Singapore.
For the past five years, Orion’s bonus scheme has been based on two criteria:
- Seniority: 60 % of the bonus pool is allocated by length of service.
- Team Sales Performance: 40 % is tied to the overall sales revenue of the division.
Individual sales figures are not directly rewarded in the current system.
The Situation
In 2024, a newly hired junior sales executive, Farah, joined the team. Although she had only 18 months of experience, Farah quickly became one of the top three individual performers, consistently exceeding her personal monthly targets by 25 – 30 %.
However, at year-end Farah’s bonus was 45 % lower than that of some senior colleagues who had lower individual sales results.
This was because the company’s bonus plan prioritized seniority (years of service) and the total team’s combined performance, rather than her personal contribution.
Farah felt unrecognized and demotivated. She began to reduce her discretionary effort (e.g., stopped volunteering for weekend sales events) and started considering offers from competitors who promised a higher commission-based pay structure.
Several other high-performing juniors shared similar frustrations, while some long-serving staff resisted any change to the existing bonus plan, seeing it as their “reward for loyalty.”
The Challenge for HR
The HR Director at Orion now faces several dilemmas:
- Retention Risk: Star performers like Farah may resign, causing a talent drain.
- Morale Gap: Junior employees feel undervalued while seniors feel entitled.
- Fairness & Motivation: The bonus system appears inequitable (Equity Theory) and reduces motivation for top individual performers.
- Balancing Interests: Management wants to preserve teamwork and loyalty while rewarding measurable performance.
Your Task
As an MBA student specializing in Human Resource Management, you have been engaged as a consultant to Orion Electronics to analyze the situation and propose solutions.
Your report should cover the following questions and areas:
- Explain the flaws in Orion’s current bonus system.
- Propose a fairer incentive plan that recognizes and rewards high-performing individuals like Farah while still promoting teamwork.
- Recommend how HR can balance team-based and individual rewards to motivate all employees fairly.
- Analyze the long-term effects on morale, turnover, and productivity if the company fails to address the perceived unfairness.
Guidelines
- Your report should be 2,000 – 2,500 words.
- Apply at least two motivation or performance-management theories (e.g., Equity Theory, Expectancy Theory, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory).
- Support your recommendations with examples from real companies (e.g., Unilever’s blended bonus approach, Salesforce’s performance-linked incentives).
- Include APA-formatted references.
- This assignment is grouping consist of 4 person
Based on the above, prepare the assignment.
Assignment submission date: 2nd February 2026
Assessment Criteria
Rubric for Master of Business Administration
| Component | Inadequate (1) | Marginal (2) | Satisfactory (3) | Excellent (4) | Assessment & Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understanding of Fundamental Knowledge in HR & Compensation | Shows little or no understanding of fundamental HR and compensation concepts. Misinterprets motivation theories or does not reference them at all. | Shows some understanding of fundamental concepts but applies them weakly or with several inaccuracies. | Demonstrates solid understanding of fundamental and some advanced HR concepts (e.g., Equity, Expectancy Theory) with adequate application to the case study. | Demonstrates deep understanding of fundamental and advanced HR & compensation concepts and integrates theories accurately to address Orion’s issues. | |
| Problem Identification | Fails to identify the core flaws in Orion’s incentive system; analysis is too superficial or irrelevant. | Identifies some problems but lacks clarity or misses important connections to employee motivation and retention. | Adequately identifies most relevant flaws in the bonus system and connects them to the case study with some supporting evidence or references. | Thoroughly identifies and articulates all key flaws in the incentive plan; integrates insights from literature or real-world cases to support the argument. | |
| Ideas Development, Selection & Incentive Plan Design | Suggests generic or impractical solutions without connecting them to the case scenario. | Suggests partially relevant solutions with limited originality; insufficient use of incentive design principles. | Proposes realistic and well-structured incentive strategies (e.g., balanced individual vs. team bonuses) that show some originality and practicality. | Proposes insightful, innovative, and data-driven incentive plans; clearly outlines rationale, feasibility, and potential impact on motivation and retention. | |
| Critical Analysis & Interpretation | Provides minimal or no critical analysis; lacks benchmarking or evidence; conclusions are weak or unsupported. | Provides some analysis but limited depth; limited interpretation of data or HR metrics. | Provides sound analysis and interpretation of the situation; draws clear inferences and supports recommendations with data or examples. | Provides strong and comprehensive critical analysis; effectively uses benchmarks, HR metrics, and theories to interpret the incentive challenges and defend recommendations. | |
| Application of Theories & Literature Review | Does not reference HR or motivation theories; no literature support. | Mentions a few theories or references but without clear linkage to the case. | Appropriately applies at least two HR/motivation theories (e.g., Equity Theory, Herzberg) and integrates some literature review. | Consistently integrates relevant HR theories and extensive literature review; demonstrates a strong connection between academic knowledge and real-world practice. | |
| Originality & Creativity | Work lacks originality; replicates basic textbook solutions with no unique approach. | Limited originality; solutions remain conservative or predictable. | Shows adequate originality; attempts new angles or blended approaches to the incentive design. | Work is highly original, offering innovative strategies or perspectives to address Orion’s issues in a novel way. |
Assignment Guidelines
- The assignment must be typed and well presented. It must be written in business REPORT format/style. You may, however, use subheadings and bullet points where appropriate within the report. You may also incorporate graphs, tables, diagrams, and figures into the body of the report if you wish. (If lengthy, material of this kind may be attached as appendices.)
- In this particular assignment you MUST include a bibliography. This should be on a separate page. FULL details are required – name and initials of all authors, full title, publisher, place, and date of publication. At this level of study, you must get these details right!
- The word limit for the first assignment is 2,000 words. You will not be penalised for exceeding these limits – within reason (say 10%) – provided that there is no repetitiveness, irrelevance, or “padding”. Similarly, you will not be penalised for being under the word limit, provided that the question has been fully and satisfactorily answered.
- Although you are encouraged to seek a greater understanding of the issues raised in this assignment by discussing them with business practitioners of your personal acquaintance, you are NOT permitted to make unsolicited contact with business organisations to obtain information.
- All assignment submission must ensure that the Similarity Index must be below 20%-Above the range, the assessment will be rejected (e.g: due to poor citation and/or poor paraphrasing, article outright rejected, student need to do RESUBMISSION – subject for acceptance by course facilitator).
Cover Sheet for Submission of Assignment
MODULE DETAILS
Module Name : Human Resource Management Module Code: HRM501
Assignment Due date : 10th February 2026
Name of lecturer : Mrs. Nor Syafiqah Binti Abdullah
STUDENT DETAILS:
| Family Name | Given Name | Student ID Number |
|---|---|---|
DECLARATION AND STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP
- This assessment is my/our original work and no part of it has been copied from any other source except where due acknowledgement is made.
- No part of this assessment has been written for me/us by any other person except where such collaboration has been authorised by the lecturer/teacher concerned.
- I/we have not previously submitted this work for this or any other course/unit.
- I/we give permission for my/our assessment response to be reproduced, communicated, compared and archived for plagiarism detection, benchmarking or educational purposes.
Student Signature _________________________________ Date _________________
Assessment 002
Individual Presentation (Recorded Presentation)
- To complete your assignment, please record your PRESENTATION.
- A maximum of FIFTEEN (15) slides should be used in your presentation, which should be original and innovative.
- For your presentation to be successful, you must present for at least ten (10) minutes.
- The content of your presentation should follow or reflect the written part of your assignment.
Grading: This presentation is worth 10% of the overall class grade.
The presentation will be submitting by online on 10th Feb. 2026.
Assessment Criteria
Rubric for Master in Business Administration Presentation
| Performance Area | 5–4: Exceeds Standards | 3–2: Meets Standards | 1–0: Fails to Meet Standards | Score | Total Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organization | Presenter follows a clear and logical sequence: introduction → problem statement → analysis → recommendations → conclusion. Provides smooth transitions and elaborates key points with supporting evidence. | Presenter follows a mostly logical sequence but lacks smooth transitions or misses elaboration on some key points. | Presentation is disorganized or jumps around between topics; difficult for the audience to follow. | ||
| Content Knowledge & Application of HRM Concepts | Demonstrates excellent understanding of the case and applies HRM theories (e.g., Equity Theory, Performance Management, Compensation) effectively with clear real-world examples. | Demonstrates general understanding of the case and applies some relevant HRM concepts, though explanations are basic or lack examples. | Shows minimal understanding of the case; fails to apply HRM theories or makes serious conceptual errors. | ||
| Problem Identification & Analysis | Clearly identifies all core issues in Orion’s incentive system and provides in-depth, critical analysis supported by evidence and literature. | Identifies most major problems but provides limited analysis or minimal supporting evidence. | Misidentifies problems or provides superficial analysis with no evidence or justification. | ||
| Delivery | Speaks clearly, confidently, and at an audible volume for the entire room; uses precise pronunciation of HR terms; no grammatical errors. | Speaks clearly most of the time but may be too soft-spoken or make some pronunciation/grammar mistakes. | Mumbles or is difficult to hear; makes frequent grammar and pronunciation errors that distract from the presentation. | ||
| Eye Contact & Engagement | Maintains eye contact with audience throughout; interacts confidently with audience (e.g., gestures, questions). | Maintains eye contact most of the time but often relies on notes or slides. | Reads almost entirely from notes/slides and rarely makes eye contact with audience. | ||
| Visual Aids (Slides/Charts) | Uses balanced, professional-looking multimedia (charts, graphs, visuals) that enhance understanding and are error-free, attractive, and easy to read. | Uses limited or somewhat effective visuals; slides are generally readable but lack creativity or have minor errors. | Uses poor or no visuals; slides are cluttered, hard to read, or have typos/errors. |
Assessment 003
(Case Study)
Company Background
Seri Maju Electronics Sdn. Bhd. is a Malaysian-owned manufacturing company located in Shah Alam, Selangor. Established in 2010, the company produces electronic components for local and regional markets. The company employs approximately 280 employees, consisting of production operators, technicians, supervisors, and management staff.
The company has experienced steady growth over the past three years due to increased customer demand. However, rapid expansion has placed pressure on production operations and human resource management.
Current Industrial Relations Situation
In early 2025, Seri Maju Electronics Sdn. Bhd. introduced a new shift scheduling system to improve productivity and meet tight delivery deadlines. The decision was made by senior management and implemented by line supervisors without prior consultation with employees or their representatives.
Shortly after implementation, several issues emerged:
- Production employees complained that the new shift system resulted in unequal workload distribution and excessive overtime.
- Some employees claimed that overtime allocation was biased and not transparent.
- Supervisors argued that the changes were necessary to meet operational targets and denied any unfair treatment.
- Employees felt that management ignored their concerns, leading to low morale, increased absenteeism, and rising tension on the production floor.
Although the company does not currently have a formal trade union, employees have begun submitting group complaints to the HR department and hinted at escalating the issue to external authorities if no action is taken.
As the HR Manager, you are required to intervene and manage the conflict to restore workplace harmony and maintain effective industrial relations.
From the case study above, please answer the following questions below:
- Identify and explain the key industrial relations issues faced by Seri Maju Electronics Sdn. Bhd.
- Analyse the root causes of the conflict between employees and management.
- Discuss the role of the HR Manager in resolving this conflict from an industrial relations perspective.
- Propose short-term actions that HR should take to address the current conflict and restore trust.
- Recommend long-term industrial relations strategies to prevent similar conflicts in the future.
- Evaluate how effective communication and employee participation could contribute to sustainable workplace harmony in this organisation.
Assessment 004
Cross-Cultural Issues in International Human Resource Management
Assignment Objective
This assignment aims to develop students’ applied research and analytical skills by examining cross-cultural issues in International Human Resource Management (IHRM). Students are required to design and conduct a mini research project to explore how cultural differences influence HR practices, employee behavior, and organizational effectiveness in an international or multicultural work environment.
Assignment Task
You are required to conduct a mini research project on the topic:
“Cross-Cultural Issues in International Human Resource Management.”
Each student (or group, if permitted) should:
- Develop a research article with conceptual framework related to cross-cultural issues in IHRM.
- Collect primary data from employees or managers working in multinational organizations or culturally diverse workplaces.
- Analyze the data using appropriate quantitative or qualitative methods.
- Prepare a written report of 3,000–4,000 words following the structure outlined below.
Assignment Structure and Guidelines
- Introduction
- Provide background information on International Human Resource Management (IHRM) and the growing importance of cross-cultural issues in multinational organisations.
- Clearly state the research problem, objectives, and research questions.
- Formulate hypotheses (if quantitative).
- Explain the significance of the study for cross-culture issues.
- Literature Review
- Review relevant theories and models related to culture and IHRM, such as:
- Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions
- Trompenaars’ Cultural Model
- Hall’s High-Context and Low-Context Culture
- Discuss prior empirical studies on cross-cultural issues in HR practices (e.g., recruitment, training, performance management, communication).
- Identify gaps or limitations in existing literature.
- Develop a conceptual framework illustrating the relationship between cultural factors and HRM outcomes.
- Review relevant theories and models related to culture and IHRM, such as:
- Research Methodology
- Research Design
- Specify whether the study is quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method.
- Identify the research type (descriptive, exploratory, correlational, etc.).
- Justify the chosen research approach.
- Population and Sampling
- Define your target population (e.g., employees, HR managers, expatriates in MNEs).
- Describe your sampling technique (random, purposive, stratified, etc.).
- Indicate the sample size (recommended: at least 30 respondents for quantitative analysis).
- Data Collection
- Collect primary data using surveys or interviews.
- Design a questionnaire or interview protocol based on established literature.
- Instruments may include cultural dimension scales or cross-cultural competence measures.
- Ensure ethical approval and informed consent from participants.
- Data Analysis
- Apply appropriate data analysis techniques:
Quantitative:- Descriptive statistics
- Correlation or regression analysis (SPSS, Excel, or similar)
Qualitative:
- Thematic or content analysis (manual or using NVivo)
- Present findings using tables, charts, or thematic summaries.
- Interpret results in relation to research objectives and literature.
- Apply appropriate data analysis techniques:
- Validity, Reliability, and Ethics
- Explain how you ensured instrument reliability (e.g., Cronbach’s Alpha > 0.7).
- Address ethical considerations: consent, anonymity, voluntary participation, and confidentiality.
- Research Design
- Results and Findings
- Present analyze data in a clear and structured manner.
- Include tables, graphs, or charts where appropriate.
- Highlight key patterns, relationships, and cross-cultural issues identified.
- Relate findings to research questions or hypotheses.
- Discussion
- Interpret findings in relation to existing theories and previous studies.
- Discuss implications for international HRM practices and cross-cultural management.
- Identify unexpected findings and provide possible explanations.
- Conclusion and Recommendations
- Summarize the major findings of the study.
- Provide practical recommendations for managing cross-cultural issues in international HRM.
- Suggest directions for future research.
- References
- Use APA 7th Edition referencing style.
- Include only sources cited in the report.
- Appendices
- Questionnaire or interview guide.
- SPSS output or analysis tables.
- Consent form and participant information sheet.
| Formatting Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Element | Requirement | |
| Font | Times New Roman or Arial | |
| Font Size | 12 pt | |
| Line Spacing | 1.5 | |
| Margins | 1 inch (2.54 cm) on all sides | |
| Alignment | Justified | |
| Word Limit | 3,000–4,000 words | |
| Citation Style | APA 7th Edition | |
| Submission Format | Word | |
| Due Date | (27th February 2026) | |
If you need any assistance regarding the subject, assignment, and presentation, please email me at norsyafiqah.lincoln@gmail.com
*Note: This checklist serves as an evaluation tool for the programme coordinator.
Score Higher in HRM501 – Get Professional Academic Support Today
Get Help By Expert
Many students find the HRM501 Human Resource Management assessments challenging because they require deep application of motivation theories, compensation design, industrial relations strategies, performance management concepts, and cross-cultural HR research with proper APA referencing. But there is no need to worry, as Malaysia Assignment Help provides expert Human Resource Management Assignment Help aligned with Lincoln University College (LUC) guidelines. You can also explore our management assignment examples for structured academic support. Order today our online assignment help and receive 100% custom, human-written assistance tailored to your case study, presentation, and research project requirements.
Convincing Features

