Convincing Features
Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
This course is designed to provide student an understanding of contemporary HRM and the various functions of human resource management, including compensation and benefits, staffing, recruitment and selection, research, labour relations, training and development, health and safety, planning, mediation and arbitration, the influence of government legislation on industry, and human rights legislation and employment equity.
On successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
| CLO1 | Outline the importance of human resource management in the context of overall management process. (C4, PLO1) |
| CLO2 | Analyze the human resource management strategies in planning and recruiting. (C4, PLO2) |
| CLO3 | Compare the global differences and similarities in human resource practices . (C4, PLO5) |
| CLO4 | Evaluate issues related to human resource management to enhance the development of entrepreneurial skills. (C5, PLO10) |
| Module Title | Human Resource Management | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Module Code | HRM501 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Module Tutor | Mrs. Nor Syafiqah Binti Abdullah | ||||||||||||||||||||
| School | School Of Business And Management | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit hours | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Level of Study | MQFL7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Brief Description | This course introduces students to the fundamentals of contemporary Human Resource Management (HRM). It covers key functions such as recruitment and selection, compensation and benefits, labour relations, training and development, health and safety, planning, and mediation. The course also highlights the impact of government legislation on industry, as well as human rights and employment equity. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Indicative Syllabus |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Learning and Teaching Activities | Lecturer / Tutorial | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assessment details |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Main References | Main references supporting the course
Additional References supporting the course:
|
Case Study: Bonus System Demotivation at Orion Electronics Sdn. Bhd.
Orion Electronics Sdn. Bhd., headquartered in Penang, Malaysia, is a mid-sized consumer-electronics manufacturer employing about 750 employees.
The company has a Sales & Marketing Division of 60 people who sell Orion’s smart-home appliances across Malaysia and Singapore.
For the past five years, Orion’s bonus scheme has been based on two criteria:
Individual sales figures are not directly rewarded in the current system.
In 2024, a newly hired junior sales executive, Farah, joined the team. Although she had only 18 months of experience, Farah quickly became one of the top three individual performers, consistently exceeding her personal monthly targets by 25 – 30 %.
However, at year-end Farah’s bonus was 45 % lower than that of some senior colleagues who had lower individual sales results.
This was because the company’s bonus plan prioritized seniority (years of service) and the total team’s combined performance, rather than her personal contribution.
Farah felt unrecognized and demotivated. She began to reduce her discretionary effort (e.g., stopped volunteering for weekend sales events) and started considering offers from competitors who promised a higher commission-based pay structure.
Several other high-performing juniors shared similar frustrations, while some long-serving staff resisted any change to the existing bonus plan, seeing it as their “reward for loyalty.”
The HR Director at Orion now faces several dilemmas:
As an MBA student specializing in Human Resource Management, you have been engaged as a consultant to Orion Electronics to analyze the situation and propose solutions.
Your report should cover the following questions and areas:
Based on the above, prepare the assignment.
Assignment submission date: 2nd February 2026
Rubric for Master of Business Administration
| Component | Inadequate (1) | Marginal (2) | Satisfactory (3) | Excellent (4) | Assessment & Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understanding of Fundamental Knowledge in HR & Compensation | Shows little or no understanding of fundamental HR and compensation concepts. Misinterprets motivation theories or does not reference them at all. | Shows some understanding of fundamental concepts but applies them weakly or with several inaccuracies. | Demonstrates solid understanding of fundamental and some advanced HR concepts (e.g., Equity, Expectancy Theory) with adequate application to the case study. | Demonstrates deep understanding of fundamental and advanced HR & compensation concepts and integrates theories accurately to address Orion’s issues. | |
| Problem Identification | Fails to identify the core flaws in Orion’s incentive system; analysis is too superficial or irrelevant. | Identifies some problems but lacks clarity or misses important connections to employee motivation and retention. | Adequately identifies most relevant flaws in the bonus system and connects them to the case study with some supporting evidence or references. | Thoroughly identifies and articulates all key flaws in the incentive plan; integrates insights from literature or real-world cases to support the argument. | |
| Ideas Development, Selection & Incentive Plan Design | Suggests generic or impractical solutions without connecting them to the case scenario. | Suggests partially relevant solutions with limited originality; insufficient use of incentive design principles. | Proposes realistic and well-structured incentive strategies (e.g., balanced individual vs. team bonuses) that show some originality and practicality. | Proposes insightful, innovative, and data-driven incentive plans; clearly outlines rationale, feasibility, and potential impact on motivation and retention. | |
| Critical Analysis & Interpretation | Provides minimal or no critical analysis; lacks benchmarking or evidence; conclusions are weak or unsupported. | Provides some analysis but limited depth; limited interpretation of data or HR metrics. | Provides sound analysis and interpretation of the situation; draws clear inferences and supports recommendations with data or examples. | Provides strong and comprehensive critical analysis; effectively uses benchmarks, HR metrics, and theories to interpret the incentive challenges and defend recommendations. | |
| Application of Theories & Literature Review | Does not reference HR or motivation theories; no literature support. | Mentions a few theories or references but without clear linkage to the case. | Appropriately applies at least two HR/motivation theories (e.g., Equity Theory, Herzberg) and integrates some literature review. | Consistently integrates relevant HR theories and extensive literature review; demonstrates a strong connection between academic knowledge and real-world practice. | |
| Originality & Creativity | Work lacks originality; replicates basic textbook solutions with no unique approach. | Limited originality; solutions remain conservative or predictable. | Shows adequate originality; attempts new angles or blended approaches to the incentive design. | Work is highly original, offering innovative strategies or perspectives to address Orion’s issues in a novel way. |
Module Name : Human Resource Management Module Code: HRM501
Assignment Due date : 10th February 2026
Name of lecturer : Mrs. Nor Syafiqah Binti Abdullah
| Family Name | Given Name | Student ID Number |
|---|---|---|
DECLARATION AND STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP
Student Signature _________________________________ Date _________________
Grading: This presentation is worth 10% of the overall class grade.
The presentation will be submitting by online on 10th Feb. 2026.
Rubric for Master in Business Administration Presentation
| Performance Area | 5–4: Exceeds Standards | 3–2: Meets Standards | 1–0: Fails to Meet Standards | Score | Total Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organization | Presenter follows a clear and logical sequence: introduction → problem statement → analysis → recommendations → conclusion. Provides smooth transitions and elaborates key points with supporting evidence. | Presenter follows a mostly logical sequence but lacks smooth transitions or misses elaboration on some key points. | Presentation is disorganized or jumps around between topics; difficult for the audience to follow. | ||
| Content Knowledge & Application of HRM Concepts | Demonstrates excellent understanding of the case and applies HRM theories (e.g., Equity Theory, Performance Management, Compensation) effectively with clear real-world examples. | Demonstrates general understanding of the case and applies some relevant HRM concepts, though explanations are basic or lack examples. | Shows minimal understanding of the case; fails to apply HRM theories or makes serious conceptual errors. | ||
| Problem Identification & Analysis | Clearly identifies all core issues in Orion’s incentive system and provides in-depth, critical analysis supported by evidence and literature. | Identifies most major problems but provides limited analysis or minimal supporting evidence. | Misidentifies problems or provides superficial analysis with no evidence or justification. | ||
| Delivery | Speaks clearly, confidently, and at an audible volume for the entire room; uses precise pronunciation of HR terms; no grammatical errors. | Speaks clearly most of the time but may be too soft-spoken or make some pronunciation/grammar mistakes. | Mumbles or is difficult to hear; makes frequent grammar and pronunciation errors that distract from the presentation. | ||
| Eye Contact & Engagement | Maintains eye contact with audience throughout; interacts confidently with audience (e.g., gestures, questions). | Maintains eye contact most of the time but often relies on notes or slides. | Reads almost entirely from notes/slides and rarely makes eye contact with audience. | ||
| Visual Aids (Slides/Charts) | Uses balanced, professional-looking multimedia (charts, graphs, visuals) that enhance understanding and are error-free, attractive, and easy to read. | Uses limited or somewhat effective visuals; slides are generally readable but lack creativity or have minor errors. | Uses poor or no visuals; slides are cluttered, hard to read, or have typos/errors. |
(Case Study)
Seri Maju Electronics Sdn. Bhd. is a Malaysian-owned manufacturing company located in Shah Alam, Selangor. Established in 2010, the company produces electronic components for local and regional markets. The company employs approximately 280 employees, consisting of production operators, technicians, supervisors, and management staff.
The company has experienced steady growth over the past three years due to increased customer demand. However, rapid expansion has placed pressure on production operations and human resource management.
In early 2025, Seri Maju Electronics Sdn. Bhd. introduced a new shift scheduling system to improve productivity and meet tight delivery deadlines. The decision was made by senior management and implemented by line supervisors without prior consultation with employees or their representatives.
Shortly after implementation, several issues emerged:
Although the company does not currently have a formal trade union, employees have begun submitting group complaints to the HR department and hinted at escalating the issue to external authorities if no action is taken.
As the HR Manager, you are required to intervene and manage the conflict to restore workplace harmony and maintain effective industrial relations.
From the case study above, please answer the following questions below:
Cross-Cultural Issues in International Human Resource Management
This assignment aims to develop students’ applied research and analytical skills by examining cross-cultural issues in International Human Resource Management (IHRM). Students are required to design and conduct a mini research project to explore how cultural differences influence HR practices, employee behavior, and organizational effectiveness in an international or multicultural work environment.
You are required to conduct a mini research project on the topic:
“Cross-Cultural Issues in International Human Resource Management.”
Each student (or group, if permitted) should:
Qualitative:
| Formatting Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Element | Requirement | |
| Font | Times New Roman or Arial | |
| Font Size | 12 pt | |
| Line Spacing | 1.5 | |
| Margins | 1 inch (2.54 cm) on all sides | |
| Alignment | Justified | |
| Word Limit | 3,000–4,000 words | |
| Citation Style | APA 7th Edition | |
| Submission Format | Word | |
| Due Date | (27th February 2026) | |
If you need any assistance regarding the subject, assignment, and presentation, please email me at norsyafiqah.lincoln@gmail.com
*Note: This checklist serves as an evaluation tool for the programme coordinator.
Many students find the HRM501 Human Resource Management assessments challenging because they require deep application of motivation theories, compensation design, industrial relations strategies, performance management concepts, and cross-cultural HR research with proper APA referencing. But there is no need to worry, as Malaysia Assignment Help provides expert Human Resource Management Assignment Help aligned with Lincoln University College (LUC) guidelines. You can also explore our management assignment examples for structured academic support. Order today our online assignment help and receive 100% custom, human-written assistance tailored to your case study, presentation, and research project requirements.