Convincing Features
Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
Word limit: 1,000 words each
Weighting: 20% of total assessment (Each reflection is worth 10%) Rationale
Writing these brief reflections on selected readings helps you think about the content of what you have read as well as connect them to insights from other parts of the module or elsewhere.
These reflections will also prepare you to contribute your insights with your fellow students during class discussions.
For each additional reading Formative Assignment (not the textbook chapters), write a 2-paragraph “reflection” (1000 words) to be submitted in Word Doc format via LMS by 11:00 p.m. on the given due date.
Each reflection should communicate two things:
(1) a basic understanding of the content of the reading (paragraph 1), and
(2) your individual response to or thoughts about that topic (paragraph 2).
The latter should address the question: How does this reading change the way I think about research?
| DEFINITIONS | RUBRIC MEASUREMENT RATINGS | |||||
| Rating Criteria | Poor 1 mark |
Weak 2 mark | Adequate 3 mark | Good 4 mark | Excellent 5 mark | Specific Evaluator Expectations |
| Topic1 Understanding | Reveals little understanding of the assigned reading. Absence of research question | Reveals a superficial understanding without providing any specific piece of information. Provide research question incorrectly | Reveals a relatively clear understanding and provides a single piece of information as evidence. Provide correct research question insufficiently | Reveals clear understanding and provides more than one piece of information as evidence. Provide one correct research question | Reveals excellent understanding and provides more than 2 pieces of information as evidence. Provide two correct research questions | |
| Topic1 discussed in depth | Poor coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depth | Weak coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depth | Fair coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depth | Retrieving data. Wait a few seconds and try to cut or copy again. | Excellent coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depth | |
| Topic2 | Reveals little understanding of the assigned reading. Absence of research question | Reveals a superficial understanding without providing any specific piece of information. Provide research question incorrectly | Reveals a relatively clear understanding and provides a single piece of information as evidence. Provide correct research question insufficiently | Reveals clear understanding and provides more than one piece of information as evidence. Provide one correct research question | Reveals excellent understanding and provides more than 2 pieces of information as evidence. Provide two correct research questions | |
| Topic2 discussed in depth | Poor coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depth | Weak coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depth | Fair coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depth | Retrieving data. Wait a few seconds and try to cut or copy again. | Excellent coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depth | |
| Total: 20 marks | ||||||
Many students find Research Methods Reflection assignments difficult because they require critical engagement with readings and personal insights. If you’re struggling with tasks like reading reflections, formulating research questions, or meeting rubric expectations, our experts at Malaysia Assignment Help provide 100% human-written, AI-free, and plagiarism-free university assignment support. Explore our online assignment writing services today and get structured reflections that meet academic standards.
