Convincing Features
Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
| Course Code / Title: | MRM700 Research Methods |
| Assessment No: | Assessment 2 |
| Title: | Proposal Oral Presentation |
Task type: Presentation
Method: Individual
Weighting: 20%
Due date: 23:59 MYT, Sunday, Week 4 (19 October 2025)
Length: 10 slides, 10 minutes presentation Course learning outcomes:
Objective: This summative assessment evaluates the oral presentation of the final research project, including how well the student can communicate their findings, justify their research design, and engage with the audience through a defence of their work.
Presentation requirements:
Submission Guidelines:
Your assessment will be marked using the rubric below.
| Criteria/Level | High Distinction, Distinction, Credit, Satisfactory, Fail,
A+ A B to B+ C to C+ F (90%-100%) (80%-89%) (60-79%) (50-59%) (0-49%) |
||||
| Clarity and structure [20 marks] | The presentation is exceptionally clear, with a logical flow and well-organized content. Each section (introduction, methodology, findings, conclusion) is clearly delineated. Visual aids are used effectively. | The presentation is clear and well- structured. The content flows logically but may have minor issues with transitions or organization.
|
The presentation is adequate, but the flow of content may be slightly disorganized, or some points are unclear.
Visual aids may be helpful but not fully integrated. |
The presentation lacks clear structure. Some sections are confusing or out of order. Visual aids may be used ineffectively or are distracting. | The presentation is disorganized or confusing. There is little or no clear structure, and visual aids are either missing or inappropriate. |
| Content and Relevance [30 marks] |
The content is highly relevant,
accurately summarizing key data scope, methodology, and research contributions. There is a clear and in-depth connection to the research question. |
The content is relevant and
accurate, but may lack some depth or detailed analysis. There is some connection to the research question but may need more clarity. |
The content is relevant but
may lack focus on key findings or leave out some important details. The connection to the research question may be weak or unclear. |
The content is only partially relevant or some parts are missing or unclear. The connection to the research question is not strongly established. | The content is irrelevant,
inaccurate, or completely off- topic. There is no clear connection to the research question. |
| Delivery and engagement
[20 marks] |
The presenter speaks with confidence, maintains eye contact, and engages the audience throughout the presentation. The tone is clear and energetic, holding attention. | The delivery is clear and confident but may lack engagement or energy in some parts of the presentation. Eye contact is inconsistent. | The delivery is adequate, but the speaker may struggle with confidence or engagement. Some areas of the presentation may feel rushed or unclear. | The delivery is uncertain or lacks energy, resulting in low audience engagement. Eye contact is minimal, and the speaker may read from notes excessively. | The delivery is poor. The speaker lacks confidence and struggles to engage with the audience. There is no eye contact, and the speaker appears to be reading directly from notes or slides. |
| Visual aids and use of technology
[20 marks] |
Visual aids (slides, charts, etc.) are exceptionally welldesigned, relevant, and enhance the clarity of the presentation. They are integrated seamlessly into the speech. | Visual aids are welldesigned and relevant but may not be fully integrated into the presentation. Some slides may be too text-heavy or not as visually engaging. | Visual aids are adequate but may not be used effectively to support the content. There may be too much text or poorly designed slides. | Visual aids are underused or poorly designed, making them more of a distraction than a help. Slides may be too cluttered or poorly formatted. | No visual aids are used, or the aids are completely irrelevant or poorly designed. |
| Time
Management [10 marks] |
The presentation is perfectly timed (10 minutes), covering all relevant points with no rush or significant overrun. | The presentation is well-timed but may be slightly rushed at the end or linger on one section too long. | The presentation is a little too short or long, affecting the overall clarity and pacing. | The presentation is either too short or too long, with significant portions rushed or skipped. | The presentation is either much too short or much too long, causing confusion or disorganization. |
For further support, please visit HELP Learning Resources Centre for a range of support services and resources to help you in your learning.
Assessment plagiarism, cheating, fabrication, falsification of data or any form of assessment dishonesty is a misconduct. Refer to the Programme Handbook for more information regarding student responsibilities.
You can find information on how to request for an assessment extension in the Course Outline. You can find more important information regarding penalties for late assessment submissions, publication of results, return of marked assessments and re-sit in the Programme Handbook.
Getting ready for your MRM700 Research Methods proposal can be challenging, especially when you need to explain your research methods and defend your study confidently. If preparing slides or presenting ideas feels stressful, expert help can make the process easier. At Malaysia Assignment Help, we offer MRM700 Research Methods assignment help that’s written by real academic writers, completely plagiarism-free, and tailored to your university needs. Get professional guidance today with our assignment writing help Malaysia.
