MGM5113 Business Research Methods Assessment 2, 2026 | UMT

School

Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT)

*We aren't endorsed by this school

Assignment Type

Individual Assignment

Subject

MGM5113 Business Research Methods

Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help

Date

09/16/2026

MGM5113 Assessment 2

Quantitative Data Analysis for Case Study Research Using SPSS

In business research, case studies are frequently supported by quantitative evidence derived from survey data. This assessment evaluates your ability to execute and interpret quantitative data analysis using SPSS in support of a case study–based research problem.

You will work with a Corporate Reputation survey dataset, which has been widely used in academic research and teaching materials. The dataset originates from empirical studies examining corporate reputation and its related constructs (such as perceived quality, trust, satisfaction, and loyalty) and is commonly used to illustrate relationships between multiple constructs within an integrated research model.

Although the dataset is often analysed using structural equation modelling techniques, in this assessment you are required to analyse it using SPSS, focusing on fundamental statistical procedures that are appropriate for case study research and managerial decision-making.

Dataset Access

The dataset for this assessment can be downloaded at mgm5113oct2025. You should then import the dataset into SPSS independently and use only the provided dataset for all analyses. For further background on the dataset, students may refer to the original study by Eberl and Schwaiger (2005) or the data article by Sarstedt et al. (2023.

Assessment Tasks

You are required to complete all tasks below and present your findings in a structured report:

Task 1: Data Import and Preparation

  1. Import the provided Excel dataset into SPSS.
  2. Check and define: variable labels, value labels, measurement levels (nominal, ordinal, scale).
  3. Identify missing values in the dataset.
  4. Apply an appropriate missing value imputation method.
  5. Briefly justify your chosen method.

Task 2: Descriptive Analysis

  1. Generate descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum) for all measurement items.
  2. Produce at least one relevant graphical output (e.g. bar chart or histogram).
  3. Describe the general pattern of responses in relation to corporate reputation and its related constructs.

Task 3: Exploratory Factor Analysis

  1. Conduct exploratory factor analysis on the measurement items.
  2. Apply an appropriate extraction and rotation method.
  3. Identify and explain the resulting factor structure.

Task 4: Reliability Analysis

  1. Conduct reliability analysis for each construct identified in Task 3.
  2. Report Cronbach’s Alpha values.
  3. Comment on the internal consistency of each construct using accepted thresholds.

Task 5: Construct Score Computation

  1. Compute the mean score for each validated construct.
  2. Clearly label the newly created construct variables (e.g., CUSL_MEAN).
  3. Explain why construct means are used instead of individual items for subsequent analysis.

Task 6: Mean Comparison Analysis

  1. Using the CUSA construct, decide on a suitable cut-off value to divide respondents into two groups: ‘High Satisfaction’ and ‘Low Satisfaction’.
  2. Clearly explain and justify your chosen cut-off (e.g. mean, median, or theoretical midpoint).
  3. Conduct an independent samples t-test to compare at least one other construct (e.g. Corporate Reputation, Trust, or Loyalty) between the two satisfaction groups.
  4. Interpret the results in managerial terms.

Task 7: Multiple Regression Analysis

  1. Refer to the original corporate reputation research model implied by the dataset.
  2. Decide on a suitable dependent variable (e.g. COMP, LIKE, CUSA or CUSL).
  3. Select two or more independent constructs that theoretically explain the chosen dependent variable.
  4. Run a correlation analysis on the selected constructs.
  5. Run a normality test on the selected constructs.
  6. Conduct a multiple regression analysis.
  7. Interpret the results with reference to: model fit (R²), significance and direction of predictors, multicollinearity (VIF / Tolerance).

Format Requirements

  • Written assignment (1500–2000 words).
  • Front cover includes student name, matric number and email address.
  • Use APA references where applicable.
  • Selected important SPSS outputs must be included in an Appendix.
  • Interpretation must be written in business-oriented language, not purely statistical terms

Looking for Reliable Academic Support for Your MGM5113 Assessment?

Get Help By Expert

Are you finding the mgm5113 business research methods assessment 2 challenging because of its SPSS requirements? Our UMT assignment help can support you with missing values, descriptive statistics, factor structures, reliability testing, construct scores and hypothesis-related analysis. Our business assignment samples provide useful examples of report organisation and presentation. Our case study writers can assist with interpreting statistical findings, explaining R², VIF and significance, and developing a clear business-oriented discussion.

Answer

UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT

Instant Paper Writing Services by Native Malaysia Writers

Plagiarism Free Solutions
100% Original Work
24*7 Online Assistance
Native PhD Experts
Hire a Writer Now
Convincing Features
MGM5113 Business Research Methods Assessment 2, 2026 | UMT
Plagiarism Free Report
On-Time Delivery
Native Writers
A+ Quality
100% Confidential
24*7 Online Assistance

Get these features included in Your Assignment

Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now!Download Our App Now!

Have Questions About Our Services?
Download Our App!

Get the App Today!

Download app QR code

Get Assistance for Assignments, online Exam, and Projects Writing