DPH 2163 Pharmacology II Individual Assignment 2026 | IJN University College
Assignment Type
Individual Assignment
Subject
DPH 2163 Pharmacology II
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
04/06/2026
DPH 2163 Individual Assignment
Program: Diploma Pharmacy
Course Name: Pharmacology II
Module Code: DPH 2163
Title of Assignment: Individual Assignment
Weightage: 30%
Related CLO
CLO 1 – Describe the classification, mechanism of action, dosage, and adverse effects of drugs used in the treatment of central nervous system, endocrine, cardiovascular, and urinary tract disorders. (PLO2, C2)
CLO 2 – Demonstrate the ability to select and justify appropriate drug therapies for managing common clinical conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, epilepsy, and depression. (PLO2, C3)
CLO 3 – Evaluate the therapeutic use of drugs by analyzing their mechanisms, adverse effects, and clinical indications for optimal treatment outcomes. (PLO2, C4)
Instruction
| 1. | Type | : Individual Report Writing Assignment |
| 2. | Submission Date | : 16 April 2026 |
| 3. | Objective | • To describe the classification, mechanism of action, dosage, and adverse effects of drugs related to the assigned topic. • To analyze the therapeutic importance of these drugs in the management of relevant disorders. • To summarize the key pharmacological concepts into a clear and concise mind map for effective learning and recall. |
| 4. | Assignment format | 1. | Minimum 10 pages (including cover page, page of content, and references) |
| 2. | Font & spacing: Times New Roman, Size 12, 1.5 spacing | ||
| 3. | Referencing: APA 7th edition | ||
| 5. | Assignment sections | 1. | Introduction • Introduce the clinical condition or drug class. • Explain its importance in pharmacology and therapy. |
| 2. | Drug Classification & Mechanism of Action • Explain classification of drugs. • Describe mechanism(s) of action, supported with diagrams/tables. |
||
| 3. | Therapeutic Uses & Clinical Indications • Approved indications and off-label use. • Support with guidelines or research evidence. |
||
| 4. | Dosage, Administration & Patient Counselling • Standard dosages, routes of administration. • Counselling points (adherence, monitoring, lifestyle). |
||
| 5. | Adverse Effects & Contraindications • Common vs. serious ADRs. • Contraindications and cautions. |
||
| 6. | Critical Evaluation • Compare advantages vs. disadvantages of therapies. • Discuss recent updates or controversies. |
||
| 7. | Conclusion • Summarize key pharmacological concepts. • Highlight future directions or improvements in therapy. |
||
| 8. References • Minimum 8–10 scholarly sources (textbooks, journals, guidelines). 9. Summarized Mind Map (Compulsory) • A one-page visual mind map at the end of the report. • Should cover: Classification of drugs, Mechanisms of action, Therapeutic uses, Key adverse effects, Counselling points • Can be hand-drawn and scanned or computer-generated (e.g., Canva, PowerPoint SmartArt). |
|||
List of Drug
| No | Drug Name | Student Name |
| 1. | Imipramine | Muhammad Aziff Qusairy Bin Azizul |
| 2. | Hydralazine | Syakir Syahmi Bin Affandi |
| 3. | Nifedipine | Iffah Nasuha Binti Abd Manaf |
| 4. | Warfarin | Mohamad Fakhrushy Syakirin Bin Abd Rahman |
| 5. | Aspirin | Manna Malini A/P Gunalan |
| 6. | Clomiphene | Lishantinee A/P Gunalan |
| 7. | Tamoxifen | Damia Aina Binti Mod Ngasri |
| 8. | Letrozole | Nurul Khairunisa Ayuni Binti Nursalim |
| 9. | Metformin | Yamuna Sri A/P Vijian |
| 10 | Insulin | Yashini Supramaniam |
| 11. | Levodopa | Retikha A/P Moorthy |
| 12. | Carbidopa | Kiriyachini A/P Anbananthan |
| 13. | Phenytoin | Haziq Haikal Bin Mohamad Helme |
| 14. | Physostigmine | Thevashini A/P Maraperual |
| 15. | Flumazenil | Nur Batrisyia Binti Muhammad Nasran |
| 16. | Oxybutynin | Muhammad Ilhan Syahmi Bin Mohd Azhar |
| 17. | Naloxone | Nur Suhada Binti Mohd Ichwan |
| 18. | Atropine | Nur Adlin Syuhada Binti Norfahmi |
| 19. | Clozapine | Arifah Binti Ismail |
| 20. | Caffeine | Iqmal Azhar Bin Jamudin |
| 21. | Amphetamine | Muhammad Zulfaqar Bin Muhammad Taufiq Robin |
| 22. | Propantheline | Jovianna Bonley |
| 23. | Bethanechol | Nur Basyirah Najwa Binti Azri |
Rubric For Poster Presentation (100 MARKS)
Total Marks
Full Name: Student ID Number
Course Name/ Course Code: Pharmacology II (DPH 2163)
| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | Marks | Marks obtained |
| 5 Marks | 4 Marks | 3 Marks | 2 Marks | 1 Mark | |||
| Content Accuracy | Comprehensive, accurate, and detailed coverage of classification, MOA, dosage, ADRs. | Mostly accurate, good depth, minor gaps. | Adequate coverage, some inaccuracies or missing details. | Limited depth, several inaccuracies. | Very minimal, inaccurate, lacks understanding. | M X 7 | |
| Critical evaluation & analysis | Insightful analysis with comparisons and evaluation of therapies. | Some critical evaluation with moderate analysis. | Basic discussion with limited evaluation. | Mostly descriptive, weak analysis. | No evaluation, purely descriptive. | M X 4 | |
| Organization & clarity | Well-structured, logical flow, easy to follow. | Clear structure with minor issues. | Some organization but occasionally unclear. | Poorly organized, difficult to follow. | No clear structure. | M X 2 | |
| Summarized mind map | Clear, concise, visually engaging, covers all key points. | Covers most key points, fairly clear. | Adequate but missing important details. | Minimal, unclear or poorly structured. | Absent or irrelevant. | M X 3 | |
| Use of references (APA 7th) | 8–10 reliable references, perfectly formatted. | 6–7 references, minor formatting issues. | 4–5 references, some errors in style. | 2–3 references, major errors in formatting. | No/very few references, incorrect style. | M X 2 | |
| Originality & academic writing style | Highly original, professional academic tone. | Mostly original, good style. | Some originality, basic academic tone. | Limited originality, poor style. | Plagiarized/very poor style. | M X 1 | |
| Presentation (format, grammar, neatness) | Flawless formatting, grammar, and neatness. | Minor errors, neat overall. | Some errors, acceptable neatness. | Frequent errors, poor neatness. | Very poor grammar/format, careless. | M X 1 |
Facing Difficulty with DPH 2163 Pharmacology II Individual Assignment at IJN?
Get Help By Expert
Many students working on this DPH 2163 Pharmacology assignment find it difficult to explain drug mechanisms, dosages, and adverse effects in a clear and structured way. It can also be challenging to connect theory with clinical use and create a proper mind map. If you’re facing similar issues, you can get expert best assignment help from Malaysia Assignment Help, where work is written in a simple and accurate academic style. You can first review assignment samples to understand the approach, and if needed, choose our service write my assignment to get a customised, plagiarism-free solution prepared just for you.
Recommended Assignments for You
Related University Assignments
Convincing Features
