Convincing Features
Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
Task type: Written assignment
Method: Individual
Weighting: 40%
Due date: Written assignment – 23:59 MYT Sunday, Week 5 (14/06/2026)
Length/time: 3000 words (+/- 10%) Written assignment
Subject learning outcomes:
This coursework has been developed as an integral part of the module to enable learners to apply what they have learnt in a real-world scenario and to exercise critical analyses in developing viable recommendations and making sound conclusions.
1. From the companies which are listed on the Bursa Malaysia
select a company that is a signatory to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals / On the basis of its audited financial statements found in its most recent annual report, as well as official company sources and external literature, prepare a written report not exceeding 3,000 words.
2. Your written report, containing critical reflections, must be original and should synthesise the following twin tasks:
a. Analysis of a selected company’s financial position and financial performance using but not limited to appropriate common-size analysis and selected financial ratios, highlighting the financial issues that the company needs to address. (50%)
b. Assessment of the financial outlook of the firm with respect to the company’s sustainability-related initiatives, programmes and reporting practices, including recommendations to enhance its value for shareholders and environmental regulators, as well as its employees, suppliers and customers. (50%)
3. Please note the following:
a. Verbal presentation by way of video is not required for this assignment.
b. Use of academic sources and academic referencing conventions is expected for this assignment.
c. Refer to the XLearn site for the required reading for the assignment, required source material, guidance, and an outline of the allocation of marks between various aspects of the assignment.
4. Ensure that your report is written with correct spelling, grammar, sentences, paragraphing, and in-text referencing. Bullet points or numbering is allowed when broken down it is into sections with headings and subheadings in structuring sentences. All content must be relevant to the company’s case and knowledge of the subject matter.
5. The completed report must be uploaded to the ‘Written Report Submission’ folder on XLearn before the deadline.
Word count: The word length is 3000 words ± 10%, excluding table of contents and references but including tables and figures. State the word count on the last page before the References page.
Formatting: The assignment must be submitted as an MS-Word Document. The settings of the Word document include A4 portrait size paper with 1inch page margins in Times New Roman 12 with 1.5-line spacing in justified format.
Cover page: Learners have to upload an assignment cover page with their name, student ID, subject code and title, and the deadline for the assignment.
Referencing style: Use APA 7 referencing style. No footnotes. Present your tables and figures (together with labels and references) in the actual report for easy reading and not in appendices.
After submitting your assessment on eLearn, ensure that your Turnitin similarity index is no more than 15%. A higher score will be flagged for plagiarism. If it is higher than 15%, you may delete your submission (before the due date) and resubmit another copy of your assessment.
Your written report will be marked using the rubric below.
For further support, please visit Important Contacts for a range of support services and resources to help you in your learning.
Assessment plagiarism, cheating, fabrication, falsification of data or any form of assessment dishonesty is a misconduct. Refer to the Programme Handbook for more information regarding student responsibilities.
You can find information on how to request an assessment extension in the Subject Outline. You can find more important information regarding penalties for late assessment submissions, publication of results, return of marked assessments and re-sit in the Programme Handbook.
Criteria/Level Fail (0-59%) Satisfactory (60–69%) |
Good (70–79%) | Excellent (80-100%) | ||
Analysis of financial position, prioritising the financial issues the company needs to address (30%) |
Unsatisfactory analysis, does not summarise major elements | Adequate analysis summarising basic issues | Good analysis, covers key issues to a reasonable standard | Very good analysis which considers wide range of issues |
Evaluation of financial performance using tools and benchmarks (30%) |
Unsatisfactory evaluation, fundamental mistakes | Adequate evaluation, attempt to apply tools | Good evaluation but lack depth, basic application of tools | Excellent evaluation, correct application of tools |
Assessment of the financial outlook of the firm including recommendations to enhance value (25%) |
Unsatisfactory assessment with mistakes | Adequate assessment of basic issues, some recommendations | Good assessment considering major issues, some good recommendations | Excellent assessment, good and comprehensive recommendations |
Academic sources, referencing and presentation (10%) |
Unsatisfactory referencing, weak presentation and sources. | Adequate referencing, presentation and some sources | Good referencing, presentation and sources, may be some poor quality sources | Excellent referencing, presentation and a wide range of appropriate sources |
Report content (5%) |
Objectives were missing or poorly communicated, materials were sparsely used and/or not appropriate. | Objectives were not always clear, appropriate materials were used throughout Materials were adequate | Clear objectives, appropriate material with logical flow throughout Materials were relevant, clear, appropriate, and easy to follow | Clear objectives, appropriate material with logical flow from introduction, findings to conclusion. Materials were highly relevant, clear, appropriate, easy to follow and well-devised |
Are you searching for a accounting assignment helper for your ACC5264 finance and accounting for business decisions assessment 2? Because many students find it difficult to analyse company financial performance, assess profitability and cash flow, compare financial benchmarks, and link sustainability reporting with future business value. This is why students across Malaysia choose Malaysia Assignment Helper for academic support. Our experts deliver the finance assignment writing service and provide guidance on financial analysis, business decision-making, and sustainability reporting. You can also review our Sunway University assignment example before starting your report.
