Convincing Features
Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
Assignment Title: Budgeting and Pricing for a Real Business Project
To develop practical skills and communication skills in creating budgets and pricing strategies by applying theoretical knowledge to a simulated business project using real-world data.
Students are required to form a group of 5–6 members. Each group will work collaboratively to complete the assignment on Budgeting and Pricing of a Business. For this assignment, each group should:
1. Choose a Business Project (Startup business project)
Select one of the following options:
(Within the chosen product type, each group must identify one product to be analysed.
2. Define the Scope of the Project
Write a brief summary covering:
3. Gather Real Facts and Figures
You must collect real-world data from reliable sources to justify your budgeting and pricing. Include:
Sources may include interviews, surveys, official websites, online pricing tools, or publicly available business reports.
4. Create a Budget Plan
Build a detailed budget for the first 2 years of operation (prepared monthly for each year).
Note: Use spreadsheets (Excel) to prepare budgets, tables and calculations clearly. Copy the table to your final report.
5. Develop a Pricing Strategy
Using the data and budgets that you have prepared, explain:
6. Submit a Final Report – WEEK 10
Prepare a report that includes:
a) Cover page
b) Table of content
c) Business and market overview – Write a brief summary covering:
d) Financial Plan – Master budget includes all budget breakdown (from sales budget until Balance Sheet), with all detailed assumptions and supporting table/schedules are clearly provided.
e) Pricing analysis and rationale
f) Appendix – Data sources and references (include proofs such as photos and other references of product, materials, location, price research, interviews, etc.)
Submission Format:
7. Presentation – WEEK 9 & 10
Group Assignment: Budgeting and Pricing of a Business
Focus: Communication Skills (Bloom’s Taxonomy A3 – Apply)
Alignment with Bloom’s Taxonomy (A3 – Apply):
| Learning Outcome | Rubric Component |
| Apply budgeting techniques to a business situation | Communication of Applied Budgeting Analysis |
| Apply pricing methods using market information | Use of Real Market Data |
| Communicate applied financial analysis effectively | Clarity and Organization of Communication |
| Apply analysis to realistic business decisions | Feasibility and Practicality of the Analysis |
| Criteria | Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Satisfactory (2) | Needs Improvement (1) |
| Clarity of Communication | Budgeting and pricing ideas are communicated clearly, logically, and professionally. Explanations make the applied analysis easy to understand. | Communication is generally clear with minor issues in explanation or clarity. | Some explanations are understandable but lack clarity or detail. | Communication is unclear, confusing, or difficult to follow. |
| Organization and Presentation of Information | Information is well structured with clear introduction, analysis, and conclusion. Tables, charts, or visuals effectively support communication of budgeting and pricing analysis. | Structure is generally clear with minor weaknesses in flow or visual presentation. | Some organization present but ideas appear loosely connected. | Poor organization and ineffective presentation of information. |
| Communication of Applied Budgeting and Pricing Analysis | Budgeting and pricing concepts are clearly applied to the business scenario and communicated effectively using appropriate business terminology. | Concepts are applied and explained with minor gaps in clarity or terminology. | Limited explanation of applied analysis; some concepts are unclear. | Application and explanation of analysis are weak or inaccurate. |
| Feasibility and Practicality of the Analysis | Budgeting and pricing recommendations are realistic, practical, and clearly linked to the business environment. Communication demonstrates strong understanding of feasibility. | Recommendations are generally practical but justification of feasibility could be improved. | Some attempt to discuss feasibility but explanations are limited. | Recommendations are unrealistic or not clearly linked to the business context. |
| Use of Real Market Data (Reference) | Analysis is supported with relevant and credible real market data (e.g., industry prices, competitor information, market trends). Data is clearly integrated into the communication of analysis. | Real market data is used but integration or explanation could be stronger. | Limited use of market data or weak connection to the analysis. | No relevant market data used or data is inappropriate. |
Are you a Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) student who also needs a custom-written solution for your MAC3043 Management Accounting II Group Assignment? If yes, then this is common. Many students face difficulties completing assignments like this and choose Malaysia Assignment Help for academic assistance. Our experts provide accounting assignment help according to your course requirements. For trust and confidence, you can also check our other management assignment solutions and USIM assignment questions for better clarity. If you are struggling with any assignment or need a custom-written solution, submit your assignment today with our best assignment help service.
