Convincing Features
Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
Program: Diploma Pharmacy
Course Name: Pharmacology II
Module Code: DPH 2163
Title of Assignment: Individual Assignment
Weightage: 30%
CLO 1 – Describe the classification, mechanism of action, dosage, and adverse effects of drugs used in the treatment of central nervous system, endocrine, cardiovascular, and urinary tract disorders. (PLO2, C2)
CLO 2 – Demonstrate the ability to select and justify appropriate drug therapies for managing common clinical conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, epilepsy, and depression. (PLO2, C3)
CLO 3 – Evaluate the therapeutic use of drugs by analyzing their mechanisms, adverse effects, and clinical indications for optimal treatment outcomes. (PLO2, C4)
| 1. | Type | : Individual Report Writing Assignment |
| 2. | Submission Date | : 16 April 2026 |
| 3. | Objective | • To describe the classification, mechanism of action, dosage, and adverse effects of drugs related to the assigned topic. • To analyze the therapeutic importance of these drugs in the management of relevant disorders. • To summarize the key pharmacological concepts into a clear and concise mind map for effective learning and recall. |
| 4. | Assignment format | 1. | Minimum 10 pages (including cover page, page of content, and references) |
| 2. | Font & spacing: Times New Roman, Size 12, 1.5 spacing | ||
| 3. | Referencing: APA 7th edition | ||
| 5. | Assignment sections | 1. | Introduction • Introduce the clinical condition or drug class. • Explain its importance in pharmacology and therapy. |
| 2. | Drug Classification & Mechanism of Action • Explain classification of drugs. • Describe mechanism(s) of action, supported with diagrams/tables. |
||
| 3. | Therapeutic Uses & Clinical Indications • Approved indications and off-label use. • Support with guidelines or research evidence. |
||
| 4. | Dosage, Administration & Patient Counselling • Standard dosages, routes of administration. • Counselling points (adherence, monitoring, lifestyle). |
||
| 5. | Adverse Effects & Contraindications • Common vs. serious ADRs. • Contraindications and cautions. |
||
| 6. | Critical Evaluation • Compare advantages vs. disadvantages of therapies. • Discuss recent updates or controversies. |
||
| 7. | Conclusion • Summarize key pharmacological concepts. • Highlight future directions or improvements in therapy. |
||
| 8. References • Minimum 8–10 scholarly sources (textbooks, journals, guidelines). 9. Summarized Mind Map (Compulsory) • A one-page visual mind map at the end of the report. • Should cover: Classification of drugs, Mechanisms of action, Therapeutic uses, Key adverse effects, Counselling points • Can be hand-drawn and scanned or computer-generated (e.g., Canva, PowerPoint SmartArt). |
|||
List of Drug
| No | Drug Name | Student Name |
| 1. | Imipramine | Muhammad Aziff Qusairy Bin Azizul |
| 2. | Hydralazine | Syakir Syahmi Bin Affandi |
| 3. | Nifedipine | Iffah Nasuha Binti Abd Manaf |
| 4. | Warfarin | Mohamad Fakhrushy Syakirin Bin Abd Rahman |
| 5. | Aspirin | Manna Malini A/P Gunalan |
| 6. | Clomiphene | Lishantinee A/P Gunalan |
| 7. | Tamoxifen | Damia Aina Binti Mod Ngasri |
| 8. | Letrozole | Nurul Khairunisa Ayuni Binti Nursalim |
| 9. | Metformin | Yamuna Sri A/P Vijian |
| 10 | Insulin | Yashini Supramaniam |
| 11. | Levodopa | Retikha A/P Moorthy |
| 12. | Carbidopa | Kiriyachini A/P Anbananthan |
| 13. | Phenytoin | Haziq Haikal Bin Mohamad Helme |
| 14. | Physostigmine | Thevashini A/P Maraperual |
| 15. | Flumazenil | Nur Batrisyia Binti Muhammad Nasran |
| 16. | Oxybutynin | Muhammad Ilhan Syahmi Bin Mohd Azhar |
| 17. | Naloxone | Nur Suhada Binti Mohd Ichwan |
| 18. | Atropine | Nur Adlin Syuhada Binti Norfahmi |
| 19. | Clozapine | Arifah Binti Ismail |
| 20. | Caffeine | Iqmal Azhar Bin Jamudin |
| 21. | Amphetamine | Muhammad Zulfaqar Bin Muhammad Taufiq Robin |
| 22. | Propantheline | Jovianna Bonley |
| 23. | Bethanechol | Nur Basyirah Najwa Binti Azri |
Total Marks
Full Name: Student ID Number
Course Name/ Course Code: Pharmacology II (DPH 2163)
| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | Marks | Marks obtained |
| 5 Marks | 4 Marks | 3 Marks | 2 Marks | 1 Mark | |||
| Content Accuracy | Comprehensive, accurate, and detailed coverage of classification, MOA, dosage, ADRs. | Mostly accurate, good depth, minor gaps. | Adequate coverage, some inaccuracies or missing details. | Limited depth, several inaccuracies. | Very minimal, inaccurate, lacks understanding. | M X 7 | |
| Critical evaluation & analysis | Insightful analysis with comparisons and evaluation of therapies. | Some critical evaluation with moderate analysis. | Basic discussion with limited evaluation. | Mostly descriptive, weak analysis. | No evaluation, purely descriptive. | M X 4 | |
| Organization & clarity | Well-structured, logical flow, easy to follow. | Clear structure with minor issues. | Some organization but occasionally unclear. | Poorly organized, difficult to follow. | No clear structure. | M X 2 | |
| Summarized mind map | Clear, concise, visually engaging, covers all key points. | Covers most key points, fairly clear. | Adequate but missing important details. | Minimal, unclear or poorly structured. | Absent or irrelevant. | M X 3 | |
| Use of references (APA 7th) | 8–10 reliable references, perfectly formatted. | 6–7 references, minor formatting issues. | 4–5 references, some errors in style. | 2–3 references, major errors in formatting. | No/very few references, incorrect style. | M X 2 | |
| Originality & academic writing style | Highly original, professional academic tone. | Mostly original, good style. | Some originality, basic academic tone. | Limited originality, poor style. | Plagiarized/very poor style. | M X 1 | |
| Presentation (format, grammar, neatness) | Flawless formatting, grammar, and neatness. | Minor errors, neat overall. | Some errors, acceptable neatness. | Frequent errors, poor neatness. | Very poor grammar/format, careless. | M X 1 |
Many students working on this DPH 2163 Pharmacology assignment find it difficult to explain drug mechanisms, dosages, and adverse effects in a clear and structured way. It can also be challenging to connect theory with clinical use and create a proper mind map. If you’re facing similar issues, you can get expert best assignment help from Malaysia Assignment Help, where work is written in a simple and accurate academic style. You can first review assignment samples to understand the approach, and if needed, choose our service write my assignment to get a customised, plagiarism-free solution prepared just for you.
