MBBL5014 Business and Corporate Law Individual Assignment 2026
School
Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology (TAR UMT)
*We aren't endorsed by this school
Assignment Type
Individual Assignment
Subject
MBBL5014 Business and Corporate Law
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
07/15/2026
MBBL5014 Individual Assignment
Marks: 50 marks
(To be converted into the weightage of 30%)
Format Of Coursework
1. Each coursework must include and be compiled as per the sequence stated below:
**Turnitin Report – print and attach full pages of the report.
**Your Turnitin Report indicator shall be below 30 %.
**Students are required to attach the originality report for checking on plagiarism. Students who found the draft of assignment has more than 30% plagiarism are required to amend accordingly. Marks will be deducted accordingly depending on the level of plagiarism subject to discretion of the tutor.
Arrangement of Coursework after full pages of the report
a. Cover page:-
b. Plagiarism Statement – Appendix A;
c. Content-
(i) Table of Content
(ii) Assignment answer
(iii) References.
d. Marks Record –
e. Assessment feedback Appendix B –
2.. The written paper must comply with the following:
Font type : Arial/ Times New Roman (either one only)
Font size  : 12
Line spacing  : 1.5
Page Margin  :  1 inch (Top, bottom, left and right each)
3. Word limit: Assignment not exceeding 3000 words. The words count must be written at the end of the assignment. Table of content and the referencing are to exclude from the word count
*Â your research must be related and relevant to the topic and it is confined to authoritative and related journals.
*Irrelevant materials/discussion may cause marks to be deducted ranging from 1- 10 for each question depending on the extent of irrelevancy regardless of whether the student’s assignment is within the permitted words/pages limit subject to the discretion of the examiner.
Assessment Criteria
Written coursework will be assessed as below
 [Total: 50 marks (To be converted into the weightage of 30%)]:
| Marks | Criteria | Level |
| 40-50 | The write up is exemplary, detailed and clear. Students able to identify the issue correctly and provide a well-structured discussion with accurate application of law. | Excellent |
| 31-39 | The write up is good and clear. It contains a satisfactory discussion and students generally applied the law correctly. | Good |
| 21-30 | The write up is generally satisfactory but there is some fault in application of the law or insufficient discussion on the points. | Average |
| 1-20 | The write up contains misconception, inaccurate or irrelevant information OR no application of law to the case study, OR less insufficient points being discussed. | Poor |
| 0 | There is no write up submitted or the write up is totally out of topic. | Non-compliance |
A maximum of Five (5) marks will be deducted if students fail to comply with the rules in the assignment.
Submission Deadline
- The written assignment deadline is announced in the google classroom.
- For late submission, there will be a reduction of absolute marks from the mark’s score submitted:
- Late 1 to 3 days after deadline of submission: total marks to be deducted is 10%; ii. Late 4 to 7 days after deadline of submission: total marks to be deducted is 20%; iii. Late more than 7 days after the deadline of submission: coursework will be rejected and 0 mark will be awarded.
Coursework Task
As businesses increasingly adopt AI-powered platforms for online sales, warehousing, and logistics, critically evaluate how the Sale of Goods Act 1957 addresses issues related to the identification of goods, passing of property, and risk in automated and algorithm-driven transactions. Examine to what extent is the Act still effective in protecting both buyers and sellers in such evolving commercial environments?
(50 marks)
| Criteria | Discussion |
| 1. Introduction &
Scope |
Thoughtful framing of the topic with reference to current technological trends. Defines terms and previews main legal issues. |
| 2. Overview of SOGA
1957 |
Provides a clear overview of SOGA’s foundational structure and objectives, focusing on Sections 4–6, 18–26. |
| 3. Identification of
Goods in AI-Driven Commerce |
Links statutory provisions (e.g., ss. 6, 18) with real-world AI systems. Provides examples and highlights legal grey areas. |
| 4. Passing of Property | Clearly articulates the statutory rules and challenges their application in AIcontrolled settings (e.g., automatic triggers or machine instructions). |
| 5. Passing of Risk &
Allocation of Liability |
Demonstrates strong understanding of how traditional rules interact with digital logistics. Shows critical thinking on real-world disputes involving AI errors. |
| 6. Buyer and Seller
Protection Mechanisms |
Well-developed analysis of seller duties and buyer expectations in the AI context. Identifies protections and remaining gaps without proposing reform. |
| 7. Legal Evaluation &
Effectiveness of SOGA |
Balanced, insightful evaluation. Discusses consistency of law with business practice, without suggesting reforms. |
| 8. Conclusion | Clear, coherent summary that links back to the essay’s core objectives. No new arguments introduced. |
looking for an assignment writer for mbbl5014 business and corporate law individual assignment?
Get Help By Expert
Are you looking for an assignment writer for your mbbl5014 business and corporate law individual assignment? if you're finding it difficult to analyse the sale of goods act 1957, ai-driven commerce, passing of property, or legal evaluation, you're not alone. many students choose Malaysia Assignment Help for expert-written academic support that matches their university requirements. you can also explore our law assignment help and TAR UMT assignment example for similar assessments.
Convincing Features

