How to Answer MPU7132 Integriti dan Antirasuah 3 (Sept 2026)

You open the MPU7132 brief and see four essay-style tasks, a 120-second video, a six-page reflection, a forum and two online activity weeks, all under one slogan: “Rasuah Dihina, Maruah Dibina”. It is easy to start writing about corruption in general and lose marks for being vague. The brief is more specific than that, and so are the markers.

Quick answer: To answer MPU7132 Integriti dan Antirasuah 3 well, write in Bahasa Melayu, respect each page limit (2, 3 and 3 pages for Questions 1 to 3, six for the reflection), define your key terms in the introduction, support every argument with a referenced Malaysian example, and build the 120-second video from a storyboard before you film. The rubric rewards introduction, depth, references and originality.

Need to see how this looks on the page? Read our MPU7132 model extract, for reference only, and check the original wording on the live MPU7132 question page.

What the MPU7132 assignment actually asks for

MPU7132 Kursus Integriti dan Antirasuah 3 at Open University Malaysia (OUM) carries 80% of the course marks in the September 2026 semester, with files due on 20 November 2026. Here is how the marks are split.

Tugasan 1 is the heaviest, so most of your drafting time belongs there. Tugasan 4 is the easiest to lose by forgetting, because it depends on being online in the right weeks.

Structuring each essay in Tugasan 1

With only two or three pages per question, there is no space for a long background. Most students spend the first third restating the question. Do not. Open with a definition and a clear position, then give two or three body paragraphs, then a short conclusion.

Question 1: why maruah diri helps you reject corruption

Define maruah diri early and argue that it acts as a personal check before any law applies. Add one concrete example, for instance an officer declining a gift during a licence application. Keep the focus on the individual, because Question 2 and Question 3 move to society and politics.

Question 2: economic inequality and corruption

Present a two-way relationship. Comparative research argues that inequality increases corruption through both material and normative channels, and that corruption feeds back into inequality (You & Khagram, 2005). Add local data with care: the Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM) recorded a household income Gini coefficient of 0.404 in 2022 and 0.390 in 2024 (DOSM, 2025). A Gini figure shows income spread. It does not prove corruption levels, so say so.

Question 3: political support and integrity

Give practical rules rather than slogans. Split your answer into personal conduct, party and campaign practice, and legal safeguards. On legal safeguards, be accurate. The Political Funding Bill was still described in September 2026 as a proposal that might be tabled in 2027 (The Star, 2026), so call it a proposed reform, not existing law.

Using MACC Act and NACS evidence without over-quoting

Markers like Malaysian sources, but they dislike long copied sections. Use a statute or policy to support a point in a sentence or two, then move on.

• The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (Act 694) creates the Commission and defines the offences (Malaysia, 2009).
• Section 17A, in force since 1 June 2020, makes a commercial organisation liable when an associated person gives gratification to benefit it, with a defence of adequate procedures (Raof et al., 2024).
• The National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS) 2024–2028 replaced the National Anti-Corruption Plan 2019–2023 and was launched in May 2024 (New Straits Times, 2024).
• Transparency International (2026) gave Malaysia 52 out of 100 in the Corruption Perceptions Index 2025, ranking 54th of 182. It measures perceptions, so write “perceived corruption”.

If you want a second view on presenting evidence in a structured way, our report writing help team can guide you, but your wording must stay your own.

How to plan the 120-second video

Treat the video as a short essay in pictures. The brief asks for a storyline, visuals, brief narration, the positive effects of integrity, the harms of corruption and a call to action. That is five jobs in two minutes, so you have roughly 20 to 30 seconds each.

1. Write the one-sentence message first, for example “small choices protect big dignity”.
2. Draw a storyboard table with time, scene, narration and message columns.
3. Limit narration to short sentences in Bahasa Melayu that a viewer can follow at normal speed.
4. Show harm and benefit in contrast, not in a lecture.
5. End with one action, such as refuse, report or choose integrity.
6. Export below the 400MB limit and test that the file plays on another device before uploading.

Reflection and forum: where originality is marked

The six-page reflection (Tugasan 2) is personal, so generic text is obvious. Define maruah in your own life and career, describe two small everyday situations, and explain why fighting corruption belongs to everyone. Then state the habit you will keep. Specific details beat polished phrases.

For the forum (Tugasan 3), take a position on whether “zero tolerance” is realistic and effective, or whether it pushes corruption underground. A sharp answer says it depends on whether people can report safely and whether enforcement is even-handed. Support it with one source, then respond to a classmate. Comparing it with an earlier course such as our MPU3182 assignment guide shows how ethics tasks reward the same habits: clear definitions, examples and honest limits.

Comparison: weak versus strong MPU7132 answers

Mark-maximising checklist

• Answer in Bahasa Melayu throughout, with consistent headings such as Pengenalan and Kesimpulan.
• Stay within 2, 3 and 3 pages for Questions 1 to 3, and 6 pages for the reflection.
• Define maruah and integriti once, then use them consistently.
• Give every main argument a source and at least one example.
• Label statistics clearly and state their year and source.
• Check that the video is 120 seconds, under 400MB and has a call to action.
• Put reminders in your calendar for the Week 5 and Week 10 online activities and the 20 November 2026 deadline.
• Run a similarity check and rewrite any sentence that sounds like someone else’s.

Common mistakes

The first is writing about corruption generally and never mentioning Malaysian law or policy. The second is treating a perception index as proof. The third is exceeding page limits and losing structure in the cut. The fourth is a video that looks good but has no clear message. The fifth is a reflection written as an essay about “people” instead of about you.

If you feel stuck on structure, talk through your plan with our team through the submit assignment page, or look at how a similar ethics paper is set out in our MPU3182 ethics sample. For OUM-specific coursework support, see our OUM assignment helper and learn how we work on our about us page.

About the expert

This guide reflects the approach of Panjang Seif, who holds a Master of Science in Economic Crime Management from the University of Malaya. His expertise includes forensic accounting, corporate criminal liability and evidential issues, anti-money laundering and research methods in economic crime management. He has 7 years of experience in assignments on economic crime, has solved many case studies on current economic issues, and also worked as a crime scene investigator and for 2 years as a network analyst.

Frequently asked questions

Must I answer MPU7132 in Bahasa Melayu?

Yes, the brief expects Bahasa Melayu. Keep your terminology consistent, and write source titles in their original language when you cite them.

How long should each Tugasan 1 essay be?

Question 1 is two pages, and Questions 2 and 3 are three pages each. Plan your paragraphs before you write, because a long introduction will push your arguments out.

Can I use statistics in the inequality question?

Yes, if you name the source and year. For example, DOSM reported a Gini coefficient of 0.390 for 2024 (DOSM, 2025). Explain what the figure shows and what it does not.

What should the 120-second video contain?

A storyline, visuals, short narration, the benefits of integrity, the harms of corruption and a clear call to action. Draft a storyboard table before you start filming.

Is the Political Funding Bill law yet?

Not according to the latest report we checked. In September 2026 the minister said it could be tabled in 2027, and described that as a target (The Star, 2026). Present it as a proposed reform.

Can I reuse the sample extract in my submission?

No. The sample is for reference only, and your reflection and forum posts must reflect your own experience and voice. Use it to understand structure, not to copy sentences.

Ready to check your plan against the brief? Compare your outline with the model structure, then ask our university assignment help team if anything is unclear before you start writing.

References

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2025). Income inequality, Malaysia, 2024. https://dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/income-inequality-malaysia-2024

Malaysia. (2009). Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (Act 694). https://leap.unep.org/en/countries/my/national-legislation/anti-corruption-commission-act-2009-act-694

New Straits Times. (2024, May 7). PM launches National Anti-Corruption Strategies 2024–2028. https://www.nst.com.my/amp/news/nation/2024/05/1047321/updated-pm-launches-national-anti-corruption-strategies-2024-2028

Raof, N. A., Aziz, N. A., Omar, N., & Amin, W. L. M. (2024). Unmasking company liability for corruption by associated persons. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(5), 1222–1236. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2023-0104

The Star. (2026, September 8). Political Funding Bill expected in Parliament next year, says Azalina. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2026/09/08/political-funding-bill-expected-in-parliament-next-year-says-azalina

Transparency International. (2026). Corruption Perceptions Index 2025. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2025

You, J.-S., & Khagram, S. (2005). A comparative study of inequality and corruption. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000107