Convincing Features
Assignment Type
Subject
Uploaded by Malaysia Assignment Help
Date
DUE DATE: (17 Nov 2025 – 21 Nov 2025)
Prepare a brief report on the data structure known as the Linked List. Your report should cover the following sections:
| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Weak | Marks Obtained |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction (4 marks) | Clear, well-structured explanation of linked list concept. (4) | Mostly correct but lacks detail. (3) | Somewhat vague, limited explanation. (2) | Incorrect or missing. (0–1) | /4 |
| Overview: Arrays vs Linked Lists (6 marks) | Comprehensive comparison with examples; highlights strengths/weaknesses. (6) | Adequate comparison but misses some points. (4–5) | Basic comparison with minimal detail. (2–3) | Incomplete or irrelevant. (0–1) | /6 |
| Implementation with Diagram (8 marks) | Accurate explanation with clear, well-labeled diagram; correctly explains operations (insert, delete, search). (7–8) | Mostly correct with minor errors in diagram or explanation. (5–6) | Partial explanation with limited or unclear diagram. (3–4) | Incomplete or incorrect. (0–2) | /8 |
| Clarity, Structure & Presentation (2 marks) | Report is well-organized, clear, and grammatically correct; proper formatting. (2) | Mostly clear but with minor errors. (1) | Understandable but poorly structured or with grammar issues. (0.5) | Disorganized, unclear, or very difficult to follow. (0) | /2 |
| Marks Obtained: | |||||
| Total Marks: | /20 |
There are several types of sorting techniques (algorithms) that can be applied to organize data or elements within a data structure. The commonly used techniques are listed below:
Instruction:
Select any two (2) of the above sorting techniques. For each selected technique:
| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Weak | Marks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selection of Techniques (2 marks) | Correctly selects two distinct sorting techniques from the list. (2) | Selects two but one is not from the list. (1) | Selects only one technique. (0.5) | Incorrect or no technique selected. (0) | /2 |
| Explanation of Algorithm 1 (8 marks) | Provides a clear, step-by-step explanation of the first algorithm; uses correct terminology. (8) | Explanation is mostly clear but lacks detail in some steps. (6–7) | Explanation is vague or partially correct. (4–5) | Minimal or incorrect explanation. (0–3) | /8 |
| Explanation of Algorithm 2 (8 marks) | Provides a clear, step-by-step explanation of the second algorithm; uses correct terminology. (8) | Explanation is mostly clear but lacks detail in some steps. (6–7) | Explanation is vague or partially correct. (4–5) | Minimal or incorrect explanation. (0–3) | /8 |
| Diagram/Illustration of Algorithm 1 (5 marks) | Provides a well-labelled, accurate, and logical diagram that supports the explanation. (4–5) | Diagram is mostly correct but lacks clarity or labelling. (3) | Diagram is incomplete or partially correct. (2) | No diagram or irrelevant diagram. (0–1) | /5 |
| Diagram/Illustration of Algorithm 2 (5 marks) | Provides a well-labelled, accurate, and logical diagram that supports the explanation. (4–5) | Diagram is mostly correct but lacks clarity or labelling. (3) | Diagram is incomplete or partially correct. (2) | No diagram or irrelevant diagram. (0–1) | /5 |
| Clarity, Structure, and Presentation (2 marks) | Content is well-structured, clear, and easy to follow with correct grammar and formatting. (2) | Content is understandable but has minor grammar/formatting issues. (1) | Poorly structured, difficult to follow, or many grammar issues. (0) | /2 | |
| Marks Obtained: | |||||
| Total Marks: | /30 |
Kruskal’s algorithm can return to different minimum spanning tree (MST). An input graph is given as follows.
| Criteria | Detailed Breakdown | Marks | Marks Obtained |
|---|---|---|---|
| a) Application of Kruskal’s Algorithm | • Edges listed in ascending order of weight (2) • Correct MST edge selection without cycles (4) • Final MST clearly highlighted (2) |
8 | /8 |
| b) Directed Graph Diagram | • All vertices correctly drawn (3) • Directed edges correctly placed (4) • Proper labelling of vertices/edges (2) • Neatness and clarity (1) |
10 | /10 |
| c) Adjacency Matrix | • Correct size and labelling (3) • Correct adjacency values (6) • Neatness and clarity (1) |
10 | /10 |
| Clarity and Presentation | • Logical flow, neatness, proper step labelling (2) | 2 | /2 |
| Marks Obtained | |||
| Total Marks | 30 | /30 |
Many students struggle with the ITWB2043 Algorithms and Data Structures Group Assignment, especially when preparing Linked List reports, sorting algorithm diagrams, or Kruskal’s MST solutions. Check our Algorithms & Data Structures Assignment sample to see the quality before placing your order. Our expert writers at Malaysia Assignment Help provide 100% plagiarism-free, AI-free, and rubric-aligned solutions tailored to INTI / Malaysia university standards. If you need a custom, accurate, and fully explained solution for Question 1, 2, or 3, you meet our online assignment helper now to secure high marks with confidence.
